Haji Aziz Ali Khan Khurram Ali Khan vs nil — 262/2024

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHPA150013522024

e-Filing Number

16-10-2024

Filing Number

598/2024

Filing Date

17-Oct-2024

Registration No

262/2024

Registration Date

17-Oct-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sailu

Judge

3-Extra Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Sailu

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED

Last updated 24-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Haji Aziz Ali Khan Khurram Ali Khan

    Adv. MAGAR LAXMAN TUKARAM

  2. 2.Raisa afsar Khatoon Syed Mir isakh Ali

    Adv. MAGAR LAXMAN TUKARAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.nil

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case 262/2024 Summary The court granted the petitioners' application for a succession certificate under the Mumbai Regulation, 1827. The petitioners (Haji Aziz Ali Khan and Raisa Afsar Khatoon) sought recognition as legal heirs of the deceased Khurram Ali Khan to obtain a succession certificate for managing the deceased's estate. After examining affidavit evidence, death certificates, and other documentary proof establishing their heirship status, the court found the petitioners were legitimate heirs with no other surviving legal heirs. The court approved the issuance of the succession certificate in their names as prescribed under Sections 3 and 8 of the Mumbai Regulation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Extra Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Sailu

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Extra Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Sailu

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Extra Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Sailu

  6. 03-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Extra Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Sailu

  7. 19-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Sailu

  8. 19-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Sailu

  9. 30-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Sailu

  10. 25-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Sailu

  11. 25-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Sailu

  12. 25-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Sailu

  13. 25-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Sailu

  14. 06-May-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Sailu

  15. 01-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Sailu

  16. 15-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Sailu

  17. 07-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Sailu

  18. 20-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Sailu

  19. 02-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Sailu

  20. 17-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Sailu

  21. 17-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 17-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 262/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case 262/2024 Summary The court granted the petitioners' application for a succession certificate under the Mumbai Regulation, 1827. The petitioners (Haji Aziz Ali Khan and Raisa Afsar Khatoon) sought recognition as legal heirs of the deceased Khurram Ali Khan to obtain a succession certificate for managing the deceased's estate. After examining affidavit evidence, death certificates, and other documentary proof establishing their heirship status, the court found the petitioners were legitimate heirs with no other surviving legal heirs. The court approved the issuance of the succession certificate in their names as prescribed under Sections 3 and 8 of the Mumbai Regulation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case