Vaijanath S/o Sopanrao Dahihiphale vs The State Of Maharashtra Through Collector Advocate - R.L. Wadkile — 15/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section order 21. Status: Awaiting Warrant. Next hearing: 21st July 2026.
L.R.DKST. - Execution of Land Reference Award
CNR: MHPA110005152024
Next Hearing
21st July 2026
e-Filing Number
03-05-2024
Filing Number
463/2024
Filing Date
06-05-2024
Registration No
15/2024
Registration Date
06-05-2024
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Gangakhed
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Gangakhed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vaijanath S/o Sopanrao Dahihiphale
Adv. DESHMUKH SANGRAM VIJAYRAO
Namdev S/o Narayan Dahiphale
Adv. DESHMUKH SANGRAM VIJAYRAO
Vishwanath S/o Sopan Dahiphale
Adv. DESHMUKH SANGRAM VIJAYRAO
Respondent(s)
The State Of Maharashtra Through Collector Advocate - R.L. Wadkile
The Special Land Acquisition Officer
Executive Engineer
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Gangakhed
Awaiting Warrant
Awaiting Warrant
Awaiting Warrant
Awaiting Warrant
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-06-2026 | Awaiting Warrant |
| 18-04-2026 | Awaiting Warrant |
| 10-03-2026 | Awaiting Warrant |
| 06-01-2026 | Awaiting Warrant |
| 23-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The case (L.A.R.-R.D. No. 15/2024) filed before the Court of Hon'ble C.J.S.D at Gangakhed has been put up for argument. The execution petition seeks recovery of decreetal amount from judgment debtors (J.D. Nos. 1-3) through reissuance of attachment warrant for sale of movable property, as the decree holder claims prolonged delay in depositing the decreetal amount has caused economic hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The case (L.A.R.-R.D. No. 15/2024) filed before the Court of Hon'ble C.J.S.D at Gangakhed has been put up for argument. The execution petition seeks recovery of decreetal amount from judgment debtors (J.D. Nos. 1-3) through reissuance of attachment warrant for sale of movable property, as the decree holder claims prolonged delay in depositing the decreetal amount has caused economic hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts