Asha Subhash Maskar vs Digambar Namdeo Maskar Advocate - Lavand Ghanshyam P — 159/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Dismissal Order. Next hearing: 04th August 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHOS130004022025
e-Filing Number
17-03-2025
Filing Number
199/2025
Filing Date
18-Mar-2025
Registration No
159/2025
Registration Date
18-Mar-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Bhoom
Judge
1-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Bhoom.
Last updated 23-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Asha Subhash Maskar
Adv. Akare Prakash D.
-
2.Ajit Subhash Maskar
-
3.Ranjit Subhash Maskar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Digambar Namdeo Maskar Advocate - Lavand Ghanshyam P
-
2.Premal Digambar Maskar
-
3.Sanjivani Gorakh Khaire
-
4.Manisha Subhash Ambrule
-
5.Rohini Ankush Mane
-
6.Ashwini Vikram Kagade
-
7.Sachin Digambar Maskar
-
8.Nita Sandip Munde
Case History
-
04-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Jun-2026
Dismissal Order
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Bhoom.
-
18-Mar-2026
Dismissal Order
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Bhoom.
-
19-Nov-2025
Dismissal Order
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Bhoom.
-
10-Sep-2025
Dismissal Order
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Bhoom.
-
13-Aug-2025
Order on Exhibit
Case Summary: 159/2025 Outcome: The case was dismissed for non-prosecution. The petitioner (Asha Subhash Maskar) failed to appear in court and took no procedural steps despite multiple opportunities. The court found that allowing the case to remain pending without the petitioner's active participation would not serve justice, and therefore scheduled the case for dismissal at the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Aug-2025
Dismissal Order
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Bhoom.
-
10-May-2025
Compliance
2nd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Bhoom.
-
22-Mar-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 159/2025
Case Summary: 159/2025 Outcome: The case was dismissed for non-prosecution. The petitioner (Asha Subhash Maskar) failed to appear in court and took no procedural steps despite multiple opportunities. The court found that allowing the case to remain pending without the petitioner's active participation would not serve justice, and therefore scheduled the case for dismissal at the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts