Dattatray Bhagwat Devkar vs Mukund Govind Devkar — 343/2021

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 20-Jul-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHOS090009132021

Filing Number

467/2021

Filing Date

29-Apr-2021

Registration No

343/2021

Registration Date

29-Apr-2021

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kallam

Judge

2-2nd Jt Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Kallam

Last updated 23-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 27

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dattatray Bhagwat Devkar

    Adv. Lomate BS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mukund Govind Devkar

  2. 2.Raghuba Apparao Jagtap

  3. 3.Babar Narayan Jagtap

Case History

  1. 20-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    2nd Jt Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Kallam

  3. 23-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Jt Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Kallam

  4. 17-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Jt Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Kallam

  5. 06-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Jt Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Kallam

  6. 21-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Jt Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Kallam

  7. 18-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Jt Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Kallam

  8. 18-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Jt Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Kallam

  9. 19-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    2nd Jt Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Kallam

  10. 24-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    2nd Jt Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Kallam

  11. 03-Aug-2024

    Order on Exhibit

    Case Summary: 343/2021 Petitioner: Dattatray Bhagwat Devkar Respondents: Mukund Govind Devkar and Raghuba Apparao Jagtap and Babar Narayan Jagtap Outcome: The court dismissed the original petition (Order No. 13) by judgment dated 03-08-2024. The petitioner sought a survey/measurement of the disputed property to establish ownership boundaries, but the court found insufficient grounds for the relief requested. The court noted the petitioner failed to adequately plead encroachment details, claim damages, or establish the specific area allegedly encroached upon by respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 03-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    2nd Jt Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Kallam

  13. 24-Jun-2024

    Reply/Say

    2nd Jt Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Kallam

  14. 06-May-2024

    Reply/Say

    2nd Jt Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Kallam

  15. 25-Apr-2024

    Reply/Say

    2nd Jt Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Kallam

  16. 05-Apr-2024

    Reply/Say

    2nd Jt Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Kallam

  17. 16-Feb-2024

    Reply/Say

    2nd Jt Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Kallam

  18. 06-Jan-2024

    Reply/Say

    2nd Jt Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Kallam

  19. 07-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    2nd Jt Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Kallam

  20. 07-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    2nd Jt Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Kallam

  21. 01-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    2nd Jt Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Kallam

  22. 30-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    2nd Jt Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Kallam

  23. 04-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    2nd Jt Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Kallam

  24. 10-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    2nd Jt Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Kallam

  25. 15-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    2nd Jt Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Kallam

  26. 08-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    2nd Jt Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Kallam

  27. 23-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    2nd Jt Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Kallam

  28. 23-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    2nd Jt Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Kallam

  29. 14-Jul-2022

    Issues

  30. 14-Jul-2022

    Evidence

    2nd Jt Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Kallam

  31. 14-Jun-2022

    Issues

    2nd Jt Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Kallam

  32. 05-Apr-2022

    Written Statement

    Joint Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Kallam.

  33. 28-Feb-2022

    Written Statement

    Joint Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Kallam.

  34. 14-Jan-2022

    Summons_Ready

    Joint Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Kallam.

  35. 23-Nov-2021

    Summons_Ready

    Joint Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Kallam.

  36. 23-Sep-2021

    Summons_Ready

    Joint Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Kallam.

  37. 02-Aug-2021

    Summons_Ready

    Joint Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Kallam.

  38. 03-May-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  39. 29-Apr-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 343/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 343/2021 Petitioner: Dattatray Bhagwat Devkar Respondents: Mukund Govind Devkar and Raghuba Apparao Jagtap and Babar Narayan Jagtap Outcome: The court dismissed the original petition (Order No. 13) by judgment dated 03-08-2024. The petitioner sought a survey/measurement of the disputed property to establish ownership boundaries, but the court found insufficient grounds for the relief requested. The court noted the petitioner failed to adequately plead encroachment details, claim damages, or establish the specific area allegedly encroached upon by respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case