Ramakant Sadashiv Pawar vs Nil — 50/2026
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 02nd April 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHOS090001522026
e-Filing Number
16-01-2026
Filing Number
74/2026
Filing Date
19-Jan-2026
Registration No
50/2026
Registration Date
19-Jan-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Kallam
Judge
1-Joint Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Kallam.
Decision Date
02-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED
Last updated 23-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ramakant Sadashiv Pawar
Adv. Adv.Amit Madhukar Landge
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nil
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Apr-2026
Order on Exhibit
Case Summary: 50/2026 Court Decision: The court granted Ramakant Sadashiv Pawar's petition and declared him and Vimal Gadu Tekale as legal heirs of the deceased Hondubai Sadashiv Pawar (who died on 17/11/2025). The court ordered issuance of a succession certificate in their names after payment of required fees, with a note appended to the original document per Civil Manual Procedure Section 312. Key Reasoning: The petitioner established his claim through death certificate and authenticated documents proving he was the son of the deceased. No opposing parties contested the claim, and no objections were filed against the succession despite public notice. The evidence substantiated his status as a legal heir. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2026
Disposed
Joint Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Kallam.
-
18-Mar-2026
Arguments
Joint Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Kallam.
-
22-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 50/2026
Case Summary: 50/2026 Court Decision: The court granted Ramakant Sadashiv Pawar's petition and declared him and Vimal Gadu Tekale as legal heirs of the deceased Hondubai Sadashiv Pawar (who died on 17/11/2025). The court ordered issuance of a succession certificate in their names after payment of required fees, with a note appended to the original document per Civil Manual Procedure Section 312. Key Reasoning: The petitioner established his claim through death certificate and authenticated documents proving he was the son of the deceased. No opposing parties contested the claim, and no objections were filed against the succession despite public notice. The evidence substantiated his status as a legal heir. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts