State Of Maharashtra vs Baburao Mahadu Mitakari Advocate - Musande Panditrao S. — 159/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 06th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHOS080006352025
e-Filing Number
26-06-2025
Filing Number
243/2025
Filing Date
02-Jul-2025
Registration No
159/2025
Registration Date
03-Jul-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division Lohara
Judge
2-Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 23-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
105
Police Station
Lohara Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Baburao Mahadu Mitakari Advocate - Musande Panditrao S.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Copy of Judgment
Case 159/2025 Summary The court acquitted Baburao Mahadu Mitakari of charges under Section 65-E of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Though 15 sealed bottles of domestic liquor were recovered from the accused's possession on 31.03.2025, the prosecution failed to produce corroborating witnesses or chemical analysis reports, relying solely on one witness whose testimony lacked credibility and cooperation with the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
10-Apr-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
18-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
17-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
03-Feb-2026
Hearing
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
05-Jan-2026
Hearing
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
27-Nov-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
08-Oct-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
08-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 159/2025
Case 159/2025 Summary The court acquitted Baburao Mahadu Mitakari of charges under Section 65-E of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Though 15 sealed bottles of domestic liquor were recovered from the accused's possession on 31.03.2025, the prosecution failed to produce corroborating witnesses or chemical analysis reports, relying solely on one witness whose testimony lacked credibility and cooperation with the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts