Shivaji So Gopa Jadhav vs Shivshankar Baburao Kabade Advocate - Mali Babu G. — 1800097/2011
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 0. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 23rd July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHOS080000482011
Filing Number
1800097/2011
Filing Date
15-Sep-2011
Registration No
1800097/2011
Registration Date
15-Sep-2011
Court
Civil Court Junior Division Lohara
Judge
2-Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
Last updated 23-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shivaji So Gopa Jadhav
Adv. Potdar Ashok D.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shivshankar Baburao Kabade Advocate - Mali Babu G.
Case History
-
23-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Jun-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
23-Apr-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
18-Mar-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
15-Jan-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
13-Nov-2025
Compliance
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
11-Sep-2025
Compliance
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
24-Jul-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
12-Jun-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
08-May-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
27-Feb-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
30-Jan-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
19-Dec-2024
Written Statement
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
17-Oct-2024
Written Statement
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
19-Sep-2024
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
22-Aug-2024
Amended Plaint
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
20-Jun-2024
Amended Plaint
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
02-May-2024
Amended Plaint
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
14-Mar-2024
Amended Plaint
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
22-Feb-2024
Amended Plaint
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
21-Dec-2023
Amended Plaint
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
19-Oct-2023
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: Shivaji v. Shivshankar (RCS 97/2011) The court allowed the plaintiff's application to add Kamlakar Changdeo Jadhav as defendant No. 5 to a suit for perpetual injunction and recovery of possession. The plaintiff established that during the suit's pendency, original defendant No. 4 transferred the disputed land to his son (proposed defendant No. 5) via mutation entry. The court found Kamlakar's presence necessary to effectually adjudicate all questions and avoid multiplicity of litigation. The plaintiff was directed to amend the plaint within 14 days and serve the new defendant with summons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Oct-2023
Amended Plaint
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
05-Oct-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
07-Sep-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
24-Aug-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
20-Jul-2023
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
08-Jun-2023
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
20-Apr-2023
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
13-Apr-2023
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
02-Mar-2023
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
12-Jan-2023
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
22-Dec-2022
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
24-Nov-2022
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
13-Oct-2022
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
22-Sep-2022
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
07-Jul-2022
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
09-Jun-2022
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
28-Apr-2022
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
10-Mar-2022
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
10-Feb-2022
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
18-Dec-2021
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
11-Nov-2021
Appearance
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
07-Oct-2021
Appearance
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
24-Sep-2021
Appearance
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
09-Aug-2021
Appearance
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
14-Jun-2021
Appearance
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
23-Apr-2021
Appearance
Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
05-Apr-2021
Appearance
Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
26-Feb-2021
Restored
Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
26-Feb-2021
Appearance
Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
05-Jul-2014
Disposed
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
05-Jul-2014
Disposed
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
19-Apr-2014
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
15-Mar-2014
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
06-Feb-2014
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
05-Dec-2013
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
28-Nov-2013
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
24-Oct-2013
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
05-Oct-2013
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
22-Aug-2013
Issues
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
11-Jul-2013
Issues
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
13-Jun-2013
Issues
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
25-Apr-2013
Order Number 1View PDF
-
25-Apr-2013
Issues
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
20-Apr-2013
Issues
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
18-Apr-2013
Issues
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
16-Mar-2013
Issues
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
02-Mar-2013
Issues
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
01-Feb-2013
Issues
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
20-Dec-2012
Issues
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
06-Dec-2012
Issues
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
02-Nov-2012
Issues
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Lohara
-
21-Sep-2012
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Sep-2011
Case filed
Registration No. 1800097/2011
Case Summary: Shivaji v. Shivshankar (RCS 97/2011) The court allowed the plaintiff's application to add Kamlakar Changdeo Jadhav as defendant No. 5 to a suit for perpetual injunction and recovery of possession. The plaintiff established that during the suit's pendency, original defendant No. 4 transferred the disputed land to his son (proposed defendant No. 5) via mutation entry. The court found Kamlakar's presence necessary to effectually adjudicate all questions and avoid multiplicity of litigation. The plaintiff was directed to amend the plaint within 14 days and serve the new defendant with summons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts