Bharati Manmath Mashalkar vs The State Of Maharashtra Through The Collector, Dharashiv — 11/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order43Rule1. Disposed: Contested--APPEAL ALLOWED, CROSS OBJECTION ALLOWED on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

M.C.A. - Misc.Civil Appeal

CNR: MHOS050003792025

e-Filing Number

08-05-2025

Filing Number

253/2025

Filing Date

09-May-2025

Registration No

11/2025

Registration Date

09-May-2025

Court

Additional District Judge , Omerga

Judge

2-Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--APPEAL ALLOWED, CROSS OBJECTION ALLOWED

Last updated 23-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order43Rule1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bharati Manmath Mashalkar

    Adv. KADARI EBRAHIM USMAN

  2. 2.Dr Deepika Omprakash Bhosale

    Adv. KADARI EBRAHIM USMAN

  3. 3.Prabhavati Govindrao Mugale

    Adv. KADARI EBRAHIM USMAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State Of Maharashtra Through The Collector, Dharashiv

  2. 2.Tahasildar

  3. 3.Nayab Tahildar Mamaltdar

  4. 4.Laxmibai Ashok Mugale

  5. 5.Shahuraj Pandurang Mugale

  6. 6.Dhanraj Pandurang Mugale

  7. 7.Yogita Pradip Dhage

  8. 8.Datta Vasantrao Mugale

  9. 9.Surekha Namdev Mugale

  10. 10.Shankar Namdev Mugale

  11. 11.Ganesh Vasant Mugale

  12. 12.Prakash Sidhanna Dalgade

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Order on Exhibit

    Case Summary: Bharati Manmath Mashalkar v. State of Maharashtra (11/2025) The court allowed the plaintiffs' appeal and set aside the Nayab Tahsildar's order that had directed removal of wire fencing from their land. The court found that the Tahsildar violated mandatory provisions of the Mamlatdar's Courts Act 1906—specifically regarding plaint contents, verification, and examination procedures—and that essential details (nature of impediment, cause of action date, plaintiff/defendant particulars) were added to the application after filing, bringing it within limitation artificially. Consequently, the court restrained defendants from interfering with plaintiffs' possession and removing the fencing pending suit decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  5. 04-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  8. 31-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  9. 30-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  10. 29-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  11. 27-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  12. 12-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  13. 06-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  14. 22-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  15. 10-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  16. 01-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  17. 24-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  18. 17-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  19. 03-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  20. 27-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  21. 07-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  22. 26-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  23. 22-Sep-2025

    Order

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  24. 20-Sep-2025

    Order

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  25. 03-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  26. 30-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  27. 20-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  28. 11-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  29. 08-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  30. 02-Aug-2025

    Order on Exh

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  31. 01-Aug-2025

    Order on Exh

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  32. 28-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  33. 16-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  34. 05-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  35. 01-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  36. 25-Jun-2025

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  37. 23-Jun-2025

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  38. 20-Jun-2025

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  39. 17-Jun-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  40. 11-Jun-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  41. 10-Jun-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  42. 29-May-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Extra Jt. Adhoc District and Sessions Judge, Omerga

  43. 27-May-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    Extra Jt. Adhoc District and Sessions Judge, Omerga

  44. 17-May-2025

    Order on Exhibit

  45. 17-May-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    Extra Jt. Adhoc District and Sessions Judge, Omerga

  46. 15-May-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Extra Jt. Adhoc District and Sessions Judge, Omerga

  47. 09-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  48. 09-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 11/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Bharati Manmath Mashalkar v. State of Maharashtra (11/2025) The court allowed the plaintiffs' appeal and set aside the Nayab Tahsildar's order that had directed removal of wire fencing from their land. The court found that the Tahsildar violated mandatory provisions of the Mamlatdar's Courts Act 1906—specifically regarding plaint contents, verification, and examination procedures—and that essential details (nature of impediment, cause of action date, plaintiff/defendant particulars) were added to the application after filing, bringing it within limitation artificially. Consequently, the court restrained defendants from interfering with plaintiffs' possession and removing the fencing pending suit decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case