SADDAM ABUKOUSAR KAZI vs KHUSHRIDBEGAM GULAMRABBANI KAZI — 15/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 09. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHOS040001622026
e-Filing Number
08-01-2026
Filing Number
33/2026
Filing Date
13-Jan-2026
Registration No
15/2026
Registration Date
14-Jan-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Tuljapur
Judge
2-2nd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Tuljapur
Last updated 23-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SADDAM ABUKOUSAR KAZI
Adv. FUTANKAR RAFIQ NAJIR
-
2.ABUMUSTAJIB ABUKOUSAR KAZI
Adv. FUTANKAR RAFIQ NAJIR
Respondent(s)
-
1.KHUSHRIDBEGAM GULAMRABBANI KAZI
-
2.GULAM HUSENI ALIAS NANA GULAM RABBANI KAZI
-
3.MUKHYADHIKARI
Case History
-
24-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
04-May-2026
Written Statement
2nd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Tuljapur
-
02-Apr-2026
Order on T.I.
Case Summary: 15/2026 Outcome: The petition for temporary injunction (Order 39, Rules 1 & 2 CPC) filed by petitioners Saddam Abukousar Kazi and Abumustajib Abukousar Kazi was dismissed by the court order dated 2 April 2026. The petitioners sought to restrain respondents from encroaching upon and demolishing structures on property in Naldurg, Tuljapur district. However, the court found the petitioners failed to establish a prima facie case: critical documentary evidence (consent letter) contained inconsistencies in property boundaries, the petitioners did not file supporting evidence like photographs or witness statements, and they approached the court without clean hands by selectively filing documents. Consequently, all three conditions for temporary injunction were not satisfied, and the application was dismissed without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2026
Written Statement
2nd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Tuljapur
-
01-Apr-2026
Order on Exh
2nd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Tuljapur
-
24-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Tuljapur
-
18-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Tuljapur
-
12-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Tuljapur
-
28-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Tuljapur
-
23-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Tuljapur
-
18-Feb-2026
Citation
2nd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Tuljapur
-
12-Feb-2026
Written Statement
2nd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Tuljapur
-
06-Feb-2026
Written Statement
2nd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Tuljapur
-
20-Jan-2026
Written Statement
2nd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Tuljapur
-
15-Jan-2026
Order on Exhibit
-
15-Jan-2026
Order on Exhibit
-
15-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 15/2026
Case Summary: 15/2026 Outcome: The petition for temporary injunction (Order 39, Rules 1 & 2 CPC) filed by petitioners Saddam Abukousar Kazi and Abumustajib Abukousar Kazi was dismissed by the court order dated 2 April 2026. The petitioners sought to restrain respondents from encroaching upon and demolishing structures on property in Naldurg, Tuljapur district. However, the court found the petitioners failed to establish a prima facie case: critical documentary evidence (consent letter) contained inconsistencies in property boundaries, the petitioners did not file supporting evidence like photographs or witness statements, and they approached the court without clean hands by selectively filing documents. Consequently, all three conditions for temporary injunction were not satisfied, and the application was dismissed without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts