Sushilabai Arjun Khatale vs Vasant Raghoji Gawle — 364/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 34. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.

Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)

CNR: MHNS290021272023

Issues

Next Hearing

13th July 2026

e-Filing Number

18-10-2023

Filing Number

907/2023

Filing Date

18-10-2023

Registration No

364/2023

Registration Date

18-10-2023

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Igatpuri

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION, IGATPURI

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 34

Petitioner(s)

Sushilabai Arjun Khatale

Adv. Omprakash Bhrindwal

Respondent(s)

Vasant Raghoji Gawle

Shalan Vasant Gawle

Santosh Vasant Gawle

Vijay Vasant Kadu

Vitthal Sitaram Shinde

Santosh Kantilal Shelar

Vishram Kantilal Shelar

Dinkar Vitthal Shelar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION, IGATPURI

27-04-2026

Issues

30-03-2026

Issues

10-03-2026

Issues

11-02-2026

Issues

12-01-2026

Issues

Interim Orders

10-12-2025
Order on T.I.

Summary: The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiff, Sushilabai Arjun Khatale, in Special Civil Suit No. 364/2023. The plaintiff had executed a Notarised Agreement to Sell dated 03.09.2021 with defendants 1 and 2 for agricultural land (Gat No. 797, Mouje Adwan) for ₹4,11,000, paying ₹2,00,000 upfront. The court found a prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable loss warranting the injunction, particularly because defendants 6 and 7 executed a subsequent sale deed dated 22.08.2023 based on consent of previous owners, raising substantial triable issues. Defendants 6 and 7 are restrained from alienating, transferring, encumbering, or creating third-party interests in the suit property until final disposal of the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiff, Sushilabai Arjun Khatale, in Special Civil Suit No. 364/2023. The plaintiff had executed a Notarised Agreement to Sell dated 03.09.2021 with defendants 1 and 2 for agricultural land (Gat No. 797, Mouje Adwan) for ₹4,11,000, paying ₹2,00,000 upfront. The court found a prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable loss warranting the injunction, particularly because defendants 6 and 7 executed a subsequent sale deed dated 22.08.2023 based on consent of previous owners, raising substantial triable issues. Defendants 6 and 7 are restrained from alienating, transferring, encumbering, or creating third-party interests in the suit property until final disposal of the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division, Igatpuri All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case