Subhash Bhagaji Ambavne vs Ma Tahasildar Saheb Igatpuri — 83/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 3839. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 07th May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHNS290002382024
Next Hearing
07th May 2026
e-Filing Number
07-05-2024
Filing Number
452/2024
Filing Date
10-05-2024
Registration No
83/2024
Registration Date
10-05-2024
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Igatpuri
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION, IGATPURI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Subhash Bhagaji Ambavne
Adv. Jorvekar Sudhir Shivanath
Damodar Bhagaji Ambavne
Adv. Jorvekar Sudhir Shivanath
Suresh Bhagaji Ambavne
Adv. Jorvekar Sudhir Shivanath
Respondent(s)
Ma Tahasildar Saheb Igatpuri
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION, IGATPURI
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 10-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 18-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 15-01-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 17-12-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction to stop road construction on their agricultural land (Gat No. 77) in Nashik district. The court found that plaintiffs failed to establish a prima-facie case, irreparable loss, or favorable balance of convenience, noting that prior administrative orders (Vahivat Case 2023 and 2016) established the road as a long-existing public pathway. The court prioritized public interest in completing the government-funded rural development project over the plaintiffs' private grievance, allowing road work to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction to stop road construction on their agricultural land (Gat No. 77) in Nashik district. The court found that plaintiffs failed to establish a prima-facie case, irreparable loss, or favorable balance of convenience, noting that prior administrative orders (Vahivat Case 2023 and 2016) established the road as a long-existing public pathway. The court prioritized public interest in completing the government-funded rural development project over the plaintiffs' private grievance, allowing road work to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts