Imran Nazir Patel vs Santosh Shivaji Dalvi — 15/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38,39. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.

Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)

CNR: MHNS290001012025

Issues

Next Hearing

13th July 2026

e-Filing Number

13-02-2025

Filing Number

99/2025

Filing Date

14-02-2025

Registration No

15/2025

Registration Date

14-02-2025

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Igatpuri

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION, IGATPURI

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,38,39

Petitioner(s)

Imran Nazir Patel

Adv. Pooja Ghogare

Respondent(s)

Santosh Shivaji Dalvi

Ramesh Laxman Chumbhale

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION, IGATPURI

27-04-2026

Issues

30-03-2026

Issues

10-03-2026

Issues

16-02-2026

Issues

21-01-2026

Issues

Interim Orders

04-07-2025
Order on T.I.

Summary: The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of plaintiff Imran Najir Patel in Special Civil Suit No. 15/2025. The plaintiff had a registered agreement to sale dated 28.12.2021 with defendant No. 1 for a property in Nashik for Rs. 30 lakhs, having paid Rs. 25 lakhs as earnest money. Defendant No. 1 subsequently sold the entire property to defendant No. 2 via a registered sale-deed dated 23.10.2023, breaching the agreement. The court found the plaintiff proved a prima facie case, balance of convenience favored him, and irreparable loss would result without the injunction. Accordingly, defendants are restrained from alienating or transferring the suit property or creating any third-party interest until final disposal of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of plaintiff Imran Najir Patel in Special Civil Suit No. 15/2025. The plaintiff had a registered agreement to sale dated 28.12.2021 with defendant No. 1 for a property in Nashik for Rs. 30 lakhs, having paid Rs. 25 lakhs as earnest money. Defendant No. 1 subsequently sold the entire property to defendant No. 2 via a registered sale-deed dated 23.10.2023, breaching the agreement. The court found the plaintiff proved a prima facie case, balance of convenience favored him, and irreparable loss would result without the injunction. Accordingly, defendants are restrained from alienating or transferring the suit property or creating any third-party interest until final disposal of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division, Igatpuri All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case