Imran Nazir Patel vs Santosh Shivaji Dalvi — 15/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38,39. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.

Issues Next hearing 13-Jul-2026 this date has passed

Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)

CNR: MHNS290001012025

e-Filing Number

13-02-2025

Filing Number

99/2025

Filing Date

14-Feb-2025

Registration No

15/2025

Registration Date

14-Feb-2025

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Igatpuri

Judge

1-CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Igatpuri

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,38,39

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Imran Nazir Patel

    Adv. Pooja Ghogare

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Santosh Shivaji Dalvi

  2. 2.Ramesh Laxman Chumbhale

Case History

  1. 13-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Igatpuri

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Igatpuri

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Igatpuri

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Igatpuri

  6. 21-Jan-2026

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Igatpuri

  7. 09-Dec-2025

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Igatpuri

  8. 11-Nov-2025

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Igatpuri

  9. 29-Sep-2025

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Igatpuri

  10. 03-Sep-2025

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Igatpuri

  11. 31-Jul-2025

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Igatpuri

  12. 04-Jul-2025

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Summary: The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of plaintiff Imran Najir Patel in Special Civil Suit No. 15/2025. The plaintiff had a registered agreement to sale dated 28.12.2021 with defendant No. 1 for a property in Nashik for Rs. 30 lakhs, having paid Rs. 25 lakhs as earnest money. Defendant No. 1 subsequently sold the entire property to defendant No. 2 via a registered sale-deed dated 23.10.2023, breaching the agreement. The court found the plaintiff proved a prima facie case, balance of convenience favored him, and irreparable loss would result without the injunction. Accordingly, defendants are restrained from alienating or transferring the suit property or creating any third-party interest until final disposal of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  13. 04-Jul-2025

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Igatpuri

  14. 02-Jul-2025

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Igatpuri

  15. 30-Jun-2025

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Igatpuri

  16. 26-Jun-2025

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Igatpuri

  17. 11-Jun-2025

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Igatpuri

  18. 05-Jun-2025

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Igatpuri

  19. 02-Jun-2025

    Reply/Say

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Igatpuri

  20. 08-May-2025

    Reply/Say

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Igatpuri

  21. 25-Apr-2025

    Reply/Say

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Igatpuri

  22. 04-Apr-2025

    Reply/Say

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Igatpuri

  23. 21-Mar-2025

    Reply/Say

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Igatpuri

  24. 12-Mar-2025

    Reply/Say

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Igatpuri

  25. 07-Mar-2025

    Reply/Say

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Igatpuri

  26. 04-Mar-2025

    Reply/Say

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Igatpuri

  27. 27-Feb-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Igatpuri

  28. 15-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 14-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 15/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of plaintiff Imran Najir Patel in Special Civil Suit No. 15/2025. The plaintiff had a registered agreement to sale dated 28.12.2021 with defendant No. 1 for a property in Nashik for Rs. 30 lakhs, having paid Rs. 25 lakhs as earnest money. Defendant No. 1 subsequently sold the entire property to defendant No. 2 via a registered sale-deed dated 23.10.2023, breaching the agreement. The court found the plaintiff proved a prima facie case, balance of convenience favored him, and irreparable loss would result without the injunction. Accordingly, defendants are restrained from alienating or transferring the suit property or creating any third-party interest until final disposal of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case