Imran Nazir Patel vs Santosh Shivaji Dalvi — 15/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38,39. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHNS290001012025
Next Hearing
13th July 2026
e-Filing Number
13-02-2025
Filing Number
99/2025
Filing Date
14-02-2025
Registration No
15/2025
Registration Date
14-02-2025
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Igatpuri
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION, IGATPURI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Imran Nazir Patel
Adv. Pooja Ghogare
Respondent(s)
Santosh Shivaji Dalvi
Ramesh Laxman Chumbhale
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION, IGATPURI
Issues
Issues
Issues
Issues
Issues
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Issues | |
| 30-03-2026 | Issues | |
| 10-03-2026 | Issues | |
| 16-02-2026 | Issues | |
| 21-01-2026 | Issues |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of plaintiff Imran Najir Patel in Special Civil Suit No. 15/2025. The plaintiff had a registered agreement to sale dated 28.12.2021 with defendant No. 1 for a property in Nashik for Rs. 30 lakhs, having paid Rs. 25 lakhs as earnest money. Defendant No. 1 subsequently sold the entire property to defendant No. 2 via a registered sale-deed dated 23.10.2023, breaching the agreement. The court found the plaintiff proved a prima facie case, balance of convenience favored him, and irreparable loss would result without the injunction. Accordingly, defendants are restrained from alienating or transferring the suit property or creating any third-party interest until final disposal of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of plaintiff Imran Najir Patel in Special Civil Suit No. 15/2025. The plaintiff had a registered agreement to sale dated 28.12.2021 with defendant No. 1 for a property in Nashik for Rs. 30 lakhs, having paid Rs. 25 lakhs as earnest money. Defendant No. 1 subsequently sold the entire property to defendant No. 2 via a registered sale-deed dated 23.10.2023, breaching the agreement. The court found the plaintiff proved a prima facie case, balance of convenience favored him, and irreparable loss would result without the injunction. Accordingly, defendants are restrained from alienating or transferring the suit property or creating any third-party interest until final disposal of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts