Laxman Damodar Satve vs Motiram Damodar Satve deceased Lrs, Yamunabai Motiram Satve — 107/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act. Status: Ex_Party Hearing. Next hearing: 14th July 2026.

Ex_Party Hearing Next hearing 14-Jul-2026

Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)

CNR: MHNS280017342023

Filing Number

750/2023

Filing Date

04-Oct-2018

Registration No

107/2023

Registration Date

04-Oct-2018

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Sinnar

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Laxman Damodar Satve

    Adv. Jadhav Shashikumar H.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Motiram Damodar Satve deceased Lrs, Yamunabai Motiram Satve

  2. 2.Kisan Urf Krishna Damodar Satve

  3. 3.Bharat Damodar Satve

  4. 4.Pushpabai Lalit Nimbalkar deceased Lrs Umesh Lalit Nimbalkar

  5. 5.Tulsabai Nandu Kudal deceased Lrs, Chaya Ashok Ambare

  6. 6.Seema Narendra Mali

  7. 7.Sangeeta Ashok Kare

  8. 8.Lilabai Bahiru Kadbhane

Case History

  1. 14-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-May-2026

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary - 107/2023 Court: Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar (Maharashtra) Petitioner: Laxman Damodar Satve Respondents: Motiram Damodar Satve (deceased), Yamunabai Motiram Satve, Kisan Urf Krishna Damodar Satve, Bharat Damodar Satve Outcome: The petition (Petition No. 51) was allowed. Respondent No. 9 (Kisan Urf Krishna Damodar Satve) was ordered to bear the petitioner's legal costs of ₹300, and the abetment order against Respondent No. 9 was set aside and cancelled by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  7. 17-Feb-2026

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  8. 13-Jan-2026

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  9. 06-Dec-2025

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  10. 01-Nov-2025

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  11. 28-Aug-2025

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  12. 21-Jun-2025

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  13. 11-Mar-2025

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  14. 03-Jan-2025

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  15. 18-Oct-2024

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  16. 06-Sep-2024

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  17. 23-Jul-2024

    Ex-Parte Order

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  18. 11-Jun-2024

    Ex-Parte Order

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  19. 02-Apr-2024

    Ex-Parte Order

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  20. 12-Mar-2024

    Ex-Parte Order

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  21. 21-Feb-2024

    Ex-Parte Order

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  22. 15-Dec-2023

    Ex-Parte Order

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  23. 26-Oct-2023

    Ex-Parte Order

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  24. 15-Sep-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  25. 03-Jul-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  26. 04-May-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 04-Oct-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 107/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary - 107/2023 Court: Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar (Maharashtra) Petitioner: Laxman Damodar Satve Respondents: Motiram Damodar Satve (deceased), Yamunabai Motiram Satve, Kisan Urf Krishna Damodar Satve, Bharat Damodar Satve Outcome: The petition (Petition No. 51) was allowed. Respondent No. 9 (Kisan Urf Krishna Damodar Satve) was ordered to bear the petitioner's legal costs of ₹300, and the abetment order against Respondent No. 9 was set aside and cancelled by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case