Prabhakar Fakira Kokate vs Kantabai Balasaheb Kokate Advocate - Desale Sarika K. — 347/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 109. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 19-Jun-2026

Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)

CNR: MHNS280013142023

Filing Number

757/2023

Filing Date

16-Nov-2018

Registration No

347/2023

Registration Date

16-Nov-2018

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Sinnar

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 109

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Prabhakar Fakira Kokate

    Adv. Bhalerao Sanket Kashinath

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kantabai Balasaheb Kokate Advocate - Desale Sarika K.

  2. 2.Balasaheb Raghunath Kokate

    Adv. Desale Sarika K.

Case History

  1. 19-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  4. 30-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  5. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  6. 15-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  7. 11-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  8. 03-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  9. 09-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  10. 23-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  11. 09-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  12. 01-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  13. 10-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  14. 10-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  15. 18-Dec-2024

    Issues

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  16. 05-Nov-2024

    Depositing Amount

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  17. 09-Oct-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary - Spl.C.S. No. 347/2023 (Prabhakar v. Kantabai & 1) The court allowed defendants' application for condonation of delay in filing their written statement, citing reasonable grounds including court closure during COVID-19 pandemic, defendants' illness, and lack of awareness of suit transfer. However, the court imposed costs of Rs. 200 payable to plaintiffs as penalty for the significant delay. Defendants' written statement will be taken on record upon payment of costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  18. 09-Oct-2024

    Depositing Amount

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  19. 28-Aug-2024

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  20. 24-Jul-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  21. 26-Jun-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  22. 16-Apr-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  23. 20-Feb-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  24. 09-Jan-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  25. 03-Nov-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  26. 16-Sep-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  27. 17-Jul-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 16-Nov-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 347/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary - Spl.C.S. No. 347/2023 (Prabhakar v. Kantabai & 1) The court allowed defendants' application for condonation of delay in filing their written statement, citing reasonable grounds including court closure during COVID-19 pandemic, defendants' illness, and lack of awareness of suit transfer. However, the court imposed costs of Rs. 200 payable to plaintiffs as penalty for the significant delay. Defendants' written statement will be taken on record upon payment of costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case