Rakhamabai Karbhari Zade and Others vs Sukhadev Harishchandra Zade and Others — 126/2017

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 10th March 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHNS280005352025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

554/2025

Filing Date

13-07-2017

Registration No

126/2017

Registration Date

13-07-2017

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Sinnar

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 1

Petitioner(s)

Rakhamabai Karbhari Zade and Others

Adv. Punde Chandrabhan V

Waman Karbhari Zade

Ashok Karbhari Zade

Adv. Punde Chandrabhan V

Shakuntala S.Shinde

Adv. Punde Chandrabhan V

Madhukar Karbhari Zade

Adv. Punde Chandrabhan V

Saroja Arjun Karpe

Adv. Punde Chandrabhan V

Machindranath Karbhari Zade

Adv. Punde Chandrabhan V

Respondent(s)

Sukhadev Harishchandra Zade and Others

Uttam Harishchandra Zade

Bapu Arjun Zade

Mirabai Kacharu Davkhar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

10-03-2026

Disposed

09-01-2026

Dismissal Order

18-11-2025

Ex_Party Hearing

07-10-2025

Evidence

19-08-2025

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The Civil Judge, Sinnar dismissed a suit for declaration and perpetual injunction under Order IX Rule 3 of CPC for want of prosecution. The plaintiffs failed to serve summons on three of four defendants, repeatedly ignored court directions to secure their presence, and subsequently failed to lead evidence in support of their claim despite multiple opportunities. Each party bears their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Civil Judge, Sinnar dismissed a suit for declaration and perpetual injunction under Order IX Rule 3 of CPC for want of prosecution. The plaintiffs failed to serve summons on three of four defendants, repeatedly ignored court directions to secure their presence, and subsequently failed to lead evidence in support of their claim despite multiple opportunities. Each party bears their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division, Sinnar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case