Vasant Kashinath Avhad vs Ramesh Laxman Sangale — 160/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Status: W.S. and Say. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.

W.S. and Say Next hearing 17-Jul-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHNS280003732025

e-Filing Number

03-05-2025

Filing Number

392/2025

Filing Date

03-May-2025

Registration No

160/2025

Registration Date

03-May-2025

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Sinnar

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vasant Kashinath Avhad

    Adv. LAHAMAGE SWAPNIL SUNIL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ramesh Laxman Sangale

Case History

  1. 17-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  4. 22-Jan-2026

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  5. 16-Dec-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  6. 13-Oct-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  7. 25-Aug-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  8. 01-Aug-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  9. 23-Jul-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  10. 08-May-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The plaintiff's application for status-quo against Defendant No.8 (a government officer) regarding a disputed road was rejected. The court held that since the SDO, Niphad's order (which reversed the Tahsildar's earlier order) has not been directly challenged in the suit and Section 26 of the Mamlatdar Court's Act bars suits against government officers for official acts, no prohibitory order can be issued against Defendant No.8. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 08-May-2025

    Unready Board

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  12. 08-May-2025

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  13. 03-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 03-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 160/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The plaintiff's application for status-quo against Defendant No.8 (a government officer) regarding a disputed road was rejected. The court held that since the SDO, Niphad's order (which reversed the Tahsildar's earlier order) has not been directly challenged in the suit and Section 26 of the Mamlatdar Court's Act bars suits against government officers for official acts, no prohibitory order can be issued against Defendant No.8. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case