Kamal Tukaram Murkute vs Narendrakumar Tukaram Murkute Advocate - Bhusare Uttam M. — 209/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHNS280000102023
Filing Number
5/2023
Filing Date
07-Aug-2018
Registration No
209/2023
Registration Date
07-Aug-2018
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Sinnar
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Kamal Tukaram Murkute
Adv. Patel Anwar Y.
-
2.Nandkumar Tukaram Murkute
-
3.Nalini Rajendra Ugale
Respondent(s)
-
1.Narendrakumar Tukaram Murkute Advocate - Bhusare Uttam M.
-
2.Alka Ashok Ugale
-
3.Anusaya Bhanudas Ugale
-
4.Yogeshwar Madhukar Bhusare
-
5.Machindra Pandit Raut
-
6.Collector, Nashik
-
7.Tahashildar Sinnar
Case History
-
22-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
21-Apr-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar
-
17-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar
-
20-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar
-
09-Dec-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar
-
04-Nov-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar
-
23-Sep-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar
-
12-Aug-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar
-
29-Jul-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar
-
24-Jun-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar
-
29-Apr-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar
-
02-Apr-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar
-
11-Mar-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
11-Mar-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 209/2023 Outcome: Application disposed of with an issue framed for trial. The court rejected defendants' application seeking plaint rejection on res judicata grounds. While acknowledging that the current suit involves the same property and parties as a dismissed 2009 suit (Spl.C.S. No.88/2006), the judge found that documentary evidence and pleadings required examination before determining if res judicata applies. The court framed the issue: "Whether the suit is barred by principles of res judicata?" and allowed parties to present documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar
-
24-Feb-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar
-
04-Feb-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
04-Feb-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar
-
10-Dec-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar
-
22-Oct-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar
-
19-Sep-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar
-
27-Aug-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar
-
06-Aug-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar
-
22-Jul-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar
-
02-Jul-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar
-
11-Jun-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar
-
02-Apr-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
02-Apr-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar
-
16-Mar-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar
-
12-Feb-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar
-
16-Jan-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar
-
07-Nov-2023
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar
-
19-Oct-2023
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar
-
25-Sep-2023
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar
-
21-Jul-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Aug-2018
Case filed
Registration No. 209/2023
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 209/2023 Outcome: Application disposed of with an issue framed for trial. The court rejected defendants' application seeking plaint rejection on res judicata grounds. While acknowledging that the current suit involves the same property and parties as a dismissed 2009 suit (Spl.C.S. No.88/2006), the judge found that documentary evidence and pleadings required examination before determining if res judicata applies. The court framed the issue: "Whether the suit is barred by principles of res judicata?" and allowed parties to present documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts