Ganesh Ramdas Boliz And Others vs Smita Navnath Bhad And Other — 24/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section order 43 rule 1(R). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.

M.C.A. - Misc.Civil Appeal

CNR: MHNS270005322025

Arguments

Next Hearing

05th May 2026

e-Filing Number

26-09-2025

Filing Number

258/2025

Filing Date

26-09-2025

Registration No

24/2025

Registration Date

26-09-2025

Court

Additional District Court Yeola

Judge

1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Yeola

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section order 43 rule 1(R)

Petitioner(s)

Ganesh Ramdas Boliz And Others

Adv. yogesh davange

Shivaji Tulshiram Sonawane

Adv. yogesh davange

Bhausaheb Dattu Boliz

Adv. yogesh davange

Dilip Dattu Boliz

Adv. yogesh davange

Kapil Laxman Boliz

Adv. yogesh davange

Gotiram Bhausaheb Boliz

Adv. yogesh davange

Gokul Shivaji Sonawane

Adv. yogesh davange

Dipak Shivaji Sonawane

Adv. yogesh davange

Pawan Ganesh Boliz

Adv. yogesh davange

Jivan Ganesh Boliz

Adv. yogesh davange

Arun Laxman Boliz

Adv. yogesh davange

Shankar Ramdas Boliz

Adv. yogesh davange

Prakash Shravan Bhad

Adv. yogesh davange

Rushabh Uttam Boliz

Adv. yogesh davange

Akshay Uttam Boliz

Adv. yogesh davange

Uttam Sampat Boliz

Adv. yogesh davange

Yogesh NIvrutti Jambhale

Adv. yogesh davange

Sukhdev Ganpat Boliz

Adv. yogesh davange

Arjun Ganpat Boliz

Adv. yogesh davange

Babaji Tukaram Sonawane

Adv. yogesh davange

Alka Shivaji Sonawane

Adv. yogesh davange

Wachhala Dilip Boliz

Adv. yogesh davange

Kusum Dilip Boliz

Adv. yogesh davange

Manda Bhausaheb Boliz

Adv. yogesh davange

Savita Bharat Boliz

Adv. yogesh davange

Amrapali Dnyaneshwar Boliz

Adv. yogesh davange

Nirmala Ganesh Boliz

Adv. yogesh davange

Sunita Uttam Boliz

Adv. yogesh davange

Anita Arun Boliz

Adv. yogesh davange

Chhaya Kapil Boliz

Adv. yogesh davange

Dnyaneshwar Bhausaheb Boliz

Adv. yogesh davange

Ramdas Dhondiba Boliz

Adv. yogesh davange

Laxman Dhondiba Boliz

Adv. yogesh davange

Saurabh Arun Boliz

Adv. yogesh davange

Gorakh Bhausaheb Boliz

Adv. yogesh davange

Ramesh Sakhahari Jambhale

Adv. yogesh davange

Balu Lahanu Sonawane

Adv. yogesh davange

Bhimrao Rambhau Purkar

Adv. yogesh davange

Sagar Bhimraj Purkar

Adv. yogesh davange

Hanumanta Sitaram Sonawane

Adv. yogesh davange

Bhausaheb Suryabhan Boliz

Adv. yogesh davange

Ramesh Shravan Bhad

Adv. yogesh davange

Ganesh Shravan Bhad

Adv. yogesh davange

Sharukh Usman Pathan

Adv. yogesh davange

Kanta Shankar Boliz

Adv. yogesh davange

Bhausaheb Nivrutti Jambhale

Adv. yogesh davange

Pratham Dnyaneshwar Kudal

Adv. yogesh davange

Samadhan Shamrao Shirsath

Adv. yogesh davange

Daulat Bhika Bornare

Adv. yogesh davange

Walmik Ambadas Kadam

Adv. yogesh davange

Dnyaneshwar Namdev Kudal

Adv. yogesh davange

Respondent(s)

Smita Navnath Bhad And Other

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Yeola

28-04-2026

Arguments

21-04-2026

Arguments

16-04-2026

Arguments

04-04-2026

Arguments

23-03-2026

Arguments

Interim Orders

13-10-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge, Yeola rejected the appellants' application for a stay order in Misc. Civil Appeal No. 24/2025. The court found that the respondents hold a registered sale deed dated 26.07.2024 establishing their ownership and possession of the suit property, while the appellants failed to produce documentary evidence of their possession or an agreement showing possession was transferred to them. Accordingly, the application for stay was dismissed with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge, Yeola rejected the appellants' application for a stay order in Misc. Civil Appeal No. 24/2025. The court found that the respondents hold a registered sale deed dated 26.07.2024 establishing their ownership and possession of the suit property, while the appellants failed to produce documentary evidence of their possession or an agreement showing possession was transferred to them. Accordingly, the application for stay was dismissed with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Additional District Court Yeola All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case