Satana Police Station vs Manisha Dayaram Pawar — 1034/2023
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS240027102023
e-Filing Number
19-12-2023
Filing Number
2081/2023
Filing Date
19-12-2023
Registration No
1034/2023
Registration Date
19-12-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Satana
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC SATANA
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
329
Police Station
SATANA POLICE STATION
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Satana Police Station
Adv. Padvi Mahesh Y. APP
Respondent(s)
Manisha Dayaram Pawar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC SATANA
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 09-09-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 14-08-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 09-05-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court acquitted the accused Manisha (alias Bayta Dayaram Pawar) of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(E) and criminal procedure charges, citing the prosecution's failure to produce the chemical examination report despite opportunities since the case filing date of 27/11/2023. The court found that without the chemical report, the offense cannot be proven and continuing the trial would be futile and unjust, hence the case was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court acquitted the accused Manisha (alias Bayta Dayaram Pawar) of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(E) and criminal procedure charges, citing the prosecution's failure to produce the chemical examination report despite opportunities since the case filing date of 27/11/2023. The court found that without the chemical report, the offense cannot be proven and continuing the trial would be futile and unjust, hence the case was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts