Manji Hiraman Ahire vs Minabai Hiraman Ahire Advocate - Patil Abhimanyu L. — 506/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 79. Status: Compliance. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHNS240022152025

Compliance

Next Hearing

29th April 2026

e-Filing Number

24-11-2025

Filing Number

765/2025

Filing Date

24-11-2025

Registration No

506/2025

Registration Date

24-11-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Satana

Judge

3-2ND JOINT CIVIL JUDGE, J.D. AND J.M.F.C. SATANA

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 79

Petitioner(s)

Manji Hiraman Ahire

Adv. Ravindra Patil

Keda Hiraman Ahire

Adv. Ravindra Patil

Respondent(s)

Minabai Hiraman Ahire Advocate - Patil Abhimanyu L.

Vimalbai Yashwant Bhamare

Hearing History

Judge: 3-2ND JOINT CIVIL JUDGE, J.D. AND J.M.F.C. SATANA

04-04-2026

Compliance

10-03-2026

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

18-02-2026

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

31-01-2026

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

30-01-2026

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

Interim Orders

04-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court order is substantially garbled and difficult to read reliably in the first page, though the second page is clearer. Based on the legible portions of the Marathi court order (case MHNS24002215 2025), the court has ordered Defendant No. 2 to pay costs of Rs. 500/- to the plaintiff, with the matter adjourned to 04.04.2026 for further proceedings. The court found that Defendant No. 2 failed to file a proper written reply and directed continuation of the case on the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court order is substantially garbled and difficult to read reliably in the first page, though the second page is clearer. Based on the legible portions of the Marathi court order (case MHNS24002215 2025), the court has ordered Defendant No. 2 to pay costs of Rs. 500/- to the plaintiff, with the matter adjourned to 04.04.2026 for further proceedings. The court found that Defendant No. 2 failed to file a proper written reply and directed continuation of the case on the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Satana All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case