Satana Police Station vs Kishor Baraku Bachhav — 772/2023
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS240020242023
Filing Number
1570/2023
Filing Date
06-Sep-2023
Registration No
772/2023
Registration Date
06-Sep-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Satana
Judge
2-Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Satana
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
110
Police Station
JAYKHEDA POLICE STATION
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Satana Police Station
Adv. Padvi Mahesh Y. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kishor Baraku Bachhav
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary The court acquitted the accused (Kishor Barik Bachchav) under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, and dismissed the case under Section 258 of the CrPC, 1973. The court found that the accused remained absent throughout proceedings despite multiple opportunities, no forensic report was filed by the prosecution, and without such evidence, the charges could not be proven beyond doubt, making further case continuation futile. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Satana
-
28-Oct-2025
Awaiting Summons
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Satana
-
13-May-2025
Awaiting Summons
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Satana
-
08-Nov-2024
Awaiting Summons
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Satana
-
19-Aug-2024
Awaiting Summons
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Satana
-
20-Apr-2024
Awaiting Summons
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Satana
-
09-Feb-2024
Awaiting Summons
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Satana
-
08-Nov-2023
Awaiting Summons
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Satana
-
07-Sep-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Sep-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 772/2023
Summary The court acquitted the accused (Kishor Barik Bachchav) under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, and dismissed the case under Section 258 of the CrPC, 1973. The court found that the accused remained absent throughout proceedings despite multiple opportunities, no forensic report was filed by the prosecution, and without such evidence, the charges could not be proven beyond doubt, making further case continuation futile. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts