Satana Police Station vs Ganesh @ Manoj Govind Ahire — 659/2023
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS240016122023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1245/2023
Filing Date
18-07-2023
Registration No
659/2023
Registration Date
18-07-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Satana
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC SATANA
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
110
Police Station
SATANA POLICE STATION
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Satana Police Station
Adv. Padvi Mahesh Y. APP
Respondent(s)
Ganesh @ Manoj Govind Ahire
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC SATANA
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 12-09-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 07-08-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 08-05-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court acquitted the accused (Ganesh alias Manoj Govind Ahire and others) under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(E) and other charges, dismissing the case under CrPC Section 258. The court found that despite opportunities, the prosecution failed to present the accused in court and did not file the chemical examination report, making it impossible to prove the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court acquitted the accused (Ganesh alias Manoj Govind Ahire and others) under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(E) and other charges, dismissing the case under CrPC Section 258. The court found that despite opportunities, the prosecution failed to present the accused in court and did not file the chemical examination report, making it impossible to prove the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts