Satana Police Station vs Babalu Kakaji Barde Advocate - Bhadane Karbhari P — 551/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS240014732024
Filing Number
1089/2024
Filing Date
24-Jul-2024
Registration No
551/2024
Registration Date
24-Jul-2024
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Satana
Judge
1-CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Satana
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
335
Police Station
SATANA POLICE STATION
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Satana Police Station
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Babalu Kakaji Barde Advocate - Bhadane Karbhari P
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court acquitted the accused Bablu Kakaji Burde of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 (Section 65-E) and CrPC Section 258, and ordered the case to be dismissed. The court found that the accused repeatedly failed to appear despite multiple summons/warrants, and critically, the prosecution failed to file the chemical examination report necessary to prove the offense, making further proceedings futile and wasteful of court's time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Satana
-
09-Dec-2025
Plea / Particulars
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Satana
-
09-Sep-2025
Filing of Surety
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Satana
-
29-Jul-2025
Filing of Surety
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Satana
-
09-May-2025
Filing of Surety
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Satana
-
21-Mar-2025
Filing of Surety
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Satana
-
19-Dec-2024
Filing of Surety
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Satana
-
01-Oct-2024
Filing of Surety
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Satana
-
24-Jul-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Jul-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 551/2024
The court acquitted the accused Bablu Kakaji Burde of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 (Section 65-E) and CrPC Section 258, and ordered the case to be dismissed. The court found that the accused repeatedly failed to appear despite multiple summons/warrants, and critically, the prosecution failed to file the chemical examination report necessary to prove the offense, making further proceedings futile and wasteful of court's time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts