Satana Police Station vs Pandhrinath Alias Pandit Dashrath Bagul Advocate - Patil Abhimanyu L. — 547/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS240014692024
Filing Number
1085/2024
Filing Date
24-Jul-2024
Registration No
547/2024
Registration Date
24-Jul-2024
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Satana
Judge
1-CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Satana
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
205
Police Station
SATANA POLICE STATION
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Satana Police Station
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Pandhrinath Alias Pandit Dashrath Bagul Advocate - Patil Abhimanyu L.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court acquitted the accused Pandharinath (alias Pankshit Dasrath Bagul) of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(E), and discharged the case under CrPC Section 258. The court found that despite multiple opportunities, the prosecution failed to present the accused and failed to file the chemical test report, making it impossible to prove the charges, thereby rendering further proceedings wasteful of judicial time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Satana
-
09-Dec-2025
Plea / Particulars
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Satana
-
09-Sep-2025
Filing of Surety
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Satana
-
05-Aug-2025
Filing of Surety
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Satana
-
06-May-2025
Filing of Surety
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Satana
-
17-Mar-2025
Filing of Surety
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Satana
-
24-Dec-2024
Filing of Surety
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Satana
-
01-Oct-2024
Filing of Surety
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Satana
-
24-Jul-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Jul-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 547/2024
The court acquitted the accused Pandharinath (alias Pankshit Dasrath Bagul) of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(E), and discharged the case under CrPC Section 258. The court found that despite multiple opportunities, the prosecution failed to present the accused and failed to file the chemical test report, making it impossible to prove the charges, thereby rendering further proceedings wasteful of judicial time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts