Satana Police Station vs Pandhrinath Alias Pandit Dashrath Bagul Advocate - Patil Abhimanyu L. — 547/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHNS240014692024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1085/2024

Filing Date

24-07-2024

Registration No

547/2024

Registration Date

24-07-2024

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Satana

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC SATANA

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

205

Police Station

SATANA POLICE STATION

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

Satana Police Station

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Pandhrinath Alias Pandit Dashrath Bagul Advocate - Patil Abhimanyu L.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC SATANA

10-03-2026

Disposed

09-12-2025

Plea / Particulars

09-09-2025

Filing of Surety

05-08-2025

Filing of Surety

06-05-2025

Filing of Surety

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court acquitted the accused Pandharinath (alias Pankshit Dasrath Bagul) of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(E), and discharged the case under CrPC Section 258. The court found that despite multiple opportunities, the prosecution failed to present the accused and failed to file the chemical test report, making it impossible to prove the charges, thereby rendering further proceedings wasteful of judicial time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted the accused Pandharinath (alias Pankshit Dasrath Bagul) of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(E), and discharged the case under CrPC Section 258. The court found that despite multiple opportunities, the prosecution failed to present the accused and failed to file the chemical test report, making it impossible to prove the charges, thereby rendering further proceedings wasteful of judicial time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Satana All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case