Satana Police Station vs Yashoda Ramkrushna Mali Advocate - Sonawane Sanjay R — 469/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHNS240013272024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

971/2024

Filing Date

10-07-2024

Registration No

469/2024

Registration Date

10-07-2024

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Satana

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC SATANA

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

46

Police Station

SATANA POLICE STATION

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(E)

Petitioner(s)

Satana Police Station

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Yashoda Ramkrushna Mali Advocate - Sonawane Sanjay R

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC SATANA

10-03-2026

Disposed

09-12-2025

Plea / Particulars

12-09-2025

Filing of Surety

21-08-2025

Filing of Surety

22-05-2025

Filing of Surety

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The court acquitted the accused Yashoda Ramakrishna Mali of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(E), citing that the prosecution failed to produce chemical examination reports necessary to prove the offense despite having opportunities since the case filing date of 10/07/2024. The court found that the prolonged absence of the accused and missing critical evidence rendered further proceedings wasteful of judicial time, warranting dismissal of the case under CrPC Section 258. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court acquitted the accused Yashoda Ramakrishna Mali of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(E), citing that the prosecution failed to produce chemical examination reports necessary to prove the offense despite having opportunities since the case filing date of 10/07/2024. The court found that the prolonged absence of the accused and missing critical evidence rendered further proceedings wasteful of judicial time, warranting dismissal of the case under CrPC Section 258. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Satana All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case