State Excise Department vs Devendra Dadaji Sonawane — 216/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS240005462024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
425/2024
Filing Date
14-03-2024
Registration No
216/2024
Registration Date
14-03-2024
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Satana
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC SATANA
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
21
Police Station
STATE EXCISE DEPARTMENT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Excise Department
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Devendra Dadaji Sonawane
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC SATANA
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 09-09-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 13-08-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 09-05-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary In this criminal case (Case No. 216/2024) against Devendra Dadaji Sonvane under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, the court acquitted the accused and discharged the case due to the prosecution's failure to produce the chemical examination report, which is essential to prove the offense. The court found that despite multiple opportunities, the prosecution could not present the accused before it, making continued proceedings wasteful of judicial time and resources. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary In this criminal case (Case No. 216/2024) against Devendra Dadaji Sonvane under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, the court acquitted the accused and discharged the case due to the prosecution's failure to produce the chemical examination report, which is essential to prove the offense. The court found that despite multiple opportunities, the prosecution could not present the accused before it, making continued proceedings wasteful of judicial time and resources. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts