Satana Police Station vs Sunil Baliram Pawar — 161/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS240004332024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
337/2024
Filing Date
27-02-2024
Registration No
161/2024
Registration Date
27-02-2024
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Satana
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC SATANA
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
608
Police Station
SATANA POLICE STATION
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Satana Police Station
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Sunil Baliram Pawar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC SATANA
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 09-09-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 05-08-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 06-05-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court acquitted the accused (Sunil Baluram Pavar and others) of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(E) and other offenses under the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 Section 258, finding that the prosecution failed to produce chemical examination reports essential to prove the case. The court ordered the case to be closed and directed seizure of evidence be returned as per rules, while allowing the prosecution to seek permission for further proceedings if desired. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court acquitted the accused (Sunil Baluram Pavar and others) of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(E) and other offenses under the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 Section 258, finding that the prosecution failed to produce chemical examination reports essential to prove the case. The court ordered the case to be closed and directed seizure of evidence be returned as per rules, while allowing the prosecution to seek permission for further proceedings if desired. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts