Satana Police Station vs Sachin Dadaji Panpatil — 115/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS240003112024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
232/2024
Filing Date
09-02-2024
Registration No
115/2024
Registration Date
09-02-2024
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Satana
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC SATANA
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
694
Police Station
SATANA POLICE STATION
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Satana Police Station
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Sachin Dadaji Panpatil
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC SATANA
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 09-09-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 13-08-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 09-05-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court acquitted the accused Sachin Dadaji Panpatil of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(E) and other penal offenses, and discharged the case under CrPC Section 258, citing the prosecution's failure to produce chemical examination reports and inability to produce the accused despite multiple opportunities since the case filing on 08/02/2024. The court found that proceeding without crucial forensic evidence would be futile and a waste of judicial time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court acquitted the accused Sachin Dadaji Panpatil of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(E) and other penal offenses, and discharged the case under CrPC Section 258, citing the prosecution's failure to produce chemical examination reports and inability to produce the accused despite multiple opportunities since the case filing on 08/02/2024. The court found that proceeding without crucial forensic evidence would be futile and a waste of judicial time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts