Satana Police Station vs Dadaji Kalu Ahire Advocate - Patil Yashwant H — 59/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 194(2). Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED AND SENTENCED on 08th April 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS240002512026
Filing Number
177/2026
Filing Date
10-Feb-2026
Registration No
59/2026
Registration Date
10-Feb-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Satana
Judge
1-CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Satana
Decision Date
08-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CONVICTED AND SENTENCED
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
610
Police Station
SATANA POLICE STATION
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Satana Police Station
Adv. APP Gaikwad Sagar R
Respondent(s)
-
1.Dadaji Kalu Ahire Advocate - Patil Yashwant H
-
2.Ramashing Kalu Ahire
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Court Decision Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate of Satara convicted two accused persons, Dadaji Kalu Ahire and Ramsingh Kalu Ahire, under Indian Penal Code Section 119(2) and Maharashtra Police Act Sections 112/117 for causing public disturbance by fighting and abusing at Satara Police Station premises on September 11, 2025. Each accused was sentenced to a fine of Rs. 500 with 10 days simple imprisonment in default, and their personal bonds were cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Satana
-
10-Mar-2026
Steps
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Satana
-
10-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 59/2026
Court Decision Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate of Satara convicted two accused persons, Dadaji Kalu Ahire and Ramsingh Kalu Ahire, under Indian Penal Code Section 119(2) and Maharashtra Police Act Sections 112/117 for causing public disturbance by fighting and abusing at Satara Police Station premises on September 11, 2025. Each accused was sentenced to a fine of Rs. 500 with 10 days simple imprisonment in default, and their personal bonds were cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts