State Through Ghoti P Stn vs Madhukar Ramji Khetade — 1971/2021
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(A). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS230029042021
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2763/2021
Filing Date
09-12-2021
Registration No
1971/2021
Registration Date
09-12-2021
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Igatpuri
Judge
1-2nd Jt.Civil Judge, JD and JMFC
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
245
Police Station
GHOTI POLICE STATION
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Through Ghoti P Stn
Adv. Rike Jaydev S
Respondent(s)
Madhukar Ramji Khetade
Tanhaji Chandar Bande
Bapu Laxman Bande
Pandurang Chiman Khade
Pravin Damu Lahamge
Hearing History
Judge: 1-2nd Jt.Civil Judge, JD and JMFC
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 12-11-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 26-06-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 06-02-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Igatpuri Judicial Magistrate stopped proceedings under Section 258 of CrPC against five accused persons (Madhukar Khetade and others) charged under Section 12A of the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, due to the prosecution's failure to secure their presence despite issuance of summons over a prolonged period. The accused were released from the charges, with seized cash credited to the state and remaining seized items destroyed after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Igatpuri Judicial Magistrate stopped proceedings under Section 258 of CrPC against five accused persons (Madhukar Khetade and others) charged under Section 12A of the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, due to the prosecution's failure to secure their presence despite issuance of summons over a prolonged period. The accused were released from the charges, with seized cash credited to the state and remaining seized items destroyed after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts