State Through Wadivarhe p Stn vs Shivaji Laxman Illam — 826/2022
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS230015152022
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1312/2022
Filing Date
28-09-2022
Registration No
826/2022
Registration Date
28-09-2022
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Igatpuri
Judge
3-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
130
Police Station
WADIWARE POLICE STATION
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Through Wadivarhe p Stn
Adv. App Rike Jaydev S
Respondent(s)
Shivaji Laxman Illam
Hearing History
Judge: 3-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 16-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 03-10-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 25-03-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 16-11-2024 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
The JMFC Igatpuri discharged accused Shivaji Laxman Illam of offence under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 258 CrPC due to non-filing of Chargesheet and prolonged pendency, while reserving the prosecution's right to revive the case upon arrest or securing the accused's presence. Seized liquor and property were ordered to be disposed of or auctioned post-appeal period, with original police papers retained for potential case reopening under Section 300(5) CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The JMFC Igatpuri discharged accused Shivaji Laxman Illam of offence under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 258 CrPC due to non-filing of Chargesheet and prolonged pendency, while reserving the prosecution's right to revive the case upon arrest or securing the accused's presence. Seized liquor and property were ordered to be disposed of or auctioned post-appeal period, with original police papers retained for potential case reopening under Section 300(5) CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts