Harshil Ramnik Gala and other vs Lalita Santosh Adole and others Advocate - Bharindwal Omprakash V. — 63/2020

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section cpc. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.

Issues Next hearing 04-May-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHNS230014182020

Filing Number

101/2020

Filing Date

22-Oct-2020

Registration No

63/2020

Registration Date

22-Oct-2020

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Igatpuri

Judge

4-Civil Judge, Senior Division

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section cpc

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Harshil Ramnik Gala and other

    Adv. Shinde Jitendra N.

  2. 2.Amita Arvind Bheda

  3. 3.Arvind Vershi Bheda

  4. 4.Tanishka Devleopers prop. Nandakumar Vasantrao Jadhav

  5. 5.Dashrath Sukhdev Bhagade

  6. 6.Anuja Mukund Malani

  7. 7.Ramesh singh Gopalsingh Pardeshi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Lalita Santosh Adole and others Advocate - Bharindwal Omprakash V.

  2. 2.Santosh Bhagwat Adole

  3. 3.Sunil Dnyandev Gade

  4. 4.Gramsevak Titoli

Case History

  1. 04-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Issues

    Civil Judge, Senior Division

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Issues

    Civil Judge, Senior Division

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Issues

    Civil Judge, Senior Division

  5. 12-Feb-2026

    Issues

    Civil Judge, Senior Division

  6. 19-Jan-2026

    Issues

    Civil Judge, Senior Division

  7. 12-Jan-2026

    Issues

    Civil Judge, Senior Division

  8. 16-Dec-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge, Senior Division

  9. 10-Nov-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge, Senior Division

  10. 10-Oct-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge, Senior Division

  11. 22-Sep-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge, Senior Division

  12. 11-Sep-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge, Senior Division

  13. 13-Aug-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge, Senior Division

  14. 22-Jul-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge, Senior Division

  15. 02-Jul-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge, Senior Division

  16. 02-Jun-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge, Senior Division

  17. 05-May-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge, Senior Division

  18. 19-Mar-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge, Senior Division

  19. 17-Feb-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge, Senior Division

  20. 27-Jan-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge, Senior Division

  21. 19-Dec-2024

    Issues

    Civil Judge, Senior Division

  22. 17-Oct-2024

    Issues

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  23. 22-Aug-2024

    Issues

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  24. 27-Jun-2024

    Issues

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  25. 24-Apr-2024

    Issues

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  26. 23-Feb-2024

    Issues

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  27. 16-Dec-2023

    Issues

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  28. 21-Oct-2023

    Issues

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  29. 07-Sep-2023

    Issues

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  30. 15-Jul-2023

    Issues

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  31. 28-Apr-2023

    Issues

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  32. 09-Mar-2023

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  33. 12-Jan-2023

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  34. 05-Nov-2022

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  35. 23-Sep-2022

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  36. 15-Jul-2022

    Issues

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  37. 05-May-2022

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  38. 10-Mar-2022

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  39. 06-Jan-2022

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  40. 20-Nov-2021

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  41. 14-Oct-2021

    Written Statement

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  42. 16-Sep-2021

    Written Statement

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  43. 07-Aug-2021

    Written Statement

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  44. 08-Jul-2021

    Written Statement

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  45. 06-May-2021

    Written Statement

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  46. 01-Apr-2021

    Written Statement

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  47. 22-Feb-2021

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  48. 16-Dec-2020

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Court Order Summary Harshil & Others v. Lalita & Others | Reg. Civil Suit No. 63/2020 | Nashik District Court | 16.12.2020 The court allowed the temporary injunction application, restraining defendants Nos. 01 and 02 from raising unauthorized construction on the disputed "suit way" (a 9-meter-wide road sanctioned for access to plaintiffs' properties). The court found a prima facie case of encroachment, as the plaintiffs hold clear title with completion certificates, while defendants lack authorization documents for construction on the agricultural land in block no. 76. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  49. 16-Dec-2020

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  50. 15-Dec-2020

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  51. 07-Dec-2020

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  52. 01-Dec-2020

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  53. 23-Nov-2020

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  54. 11-Nov-2020

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  55. 05-Nov-2020

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  56. 29-Oct-2020

    W.S. and Say

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  57. 26-Oct-2020

    Order on T.I.View PDF

  58. 26-Oct-2020

    W.S. and Say

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  59. 22-Oct-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  60. 22-Oct-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 63/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Harshil & Others v. Lalita & Others | Reg. Civil Suit No. 63/2020 | Nashik District Court | 16.12.2020 The court allowed the temporary injunction application, restraining defendants Nos. 01 and 02 from raising unauthorized construction on the disputed "suit way" (a 9-meter-wide road sanctioned for access to plaintiffs' properties). The court found a prima facie case of encroachment, as the plaintiffs hold clear title with completion certificates, while defendants lack authorization documents for construction on the agricultural land in block no. 76. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case