Mirabai Shantaram Bhatate vs Somnath Shantaram Bhatate Advocate - Waje Rajaram G — 211/2020
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,18,19,20,22,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 23rd March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHNS230013872020
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1287/2020
Filing Date
20-10-2020
Registration No
211/2020
Registration Date
20-10-2020
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Igatpuri
Judge
3-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mirabai Shantaram Bhatate
Adv. Lahane Balu S.
Kausabai Shantaram Bhatate
Respondent(s)
Somnath Shantaram Bhatate Advocate - Waje Rajaram G
Bhagabai Shantaram Bhatate
Hearing History
Judge: 3-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 09-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 02-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 08-01-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court rejected the domestic violence application filed by Mirabai Bhatate and her daughter against Somnath Bhatate and Bhagabai Bhatate under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found that the applicants failed to prove allegations of domestic violence, noting their evidence was vague, lacked specific particulars, and contained material inconsistencies. The court also rejected claims for maintenance and compensation as they were contingent on proving domestic violence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court rejected the domestic violence application filed by Mirabai Bhatate and her daughter against Somnath Bhatate and Bhagabai Bhatate under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found that the applicants failed to prove allegations of domestic violence, noting their evidence was vague, lacked specific particulars, and contained material inconsistencies. The court also rejected claims for maintenance and compensation as they were contingent on proving domestic violence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts