Yeshwant Soma Telam vs Tulshiram Lalu Telam Advocate - Katore Niwrutti H. — 56/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section CPC,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 10th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHNS230011642020
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
88/2020
Filing Date
24-09-2020
Registration No
56/2020
Registration Date
24-09-2020
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Igatpuri
Judge
2-Jt CJSD and Add. CJM
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Yeshwant Soma Telam
Adv. Pagare Ashok B.
Hirabai Soma Telam
Respondent(s)
Tulshiram Lalu Telam Advocate - Katore Niwrutti H.
Radhabai Lalu Telam
Adv. Katore Niwrutti H.
Daulat Chandar Bhagat
Adv. Katore Niwrutti H.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt CJSD and Add. CJM
Disposed
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 23-02-2026 | Dismissal Order | |
| 03-02-2026 | Dismissal Order | |
| 09-01-2026 | Dismissal Order | |
| 02-12-2025 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the partition suit filed by Yashwant Telam and others against Tulshiram Telam in default for want of prosecution under Order 9 Rule 8 of the CPC, 1908. The dismissal was ordered because the plaintiffs failed to adduce evidence since August 2025, the plaintiff's advocate was absent despite specific directions, and the plaintiff failed to file the required affidavit of examination-in-chief, constituting an abuse of court process. Costs have been awarded against the plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court dismissed the partition suit filed by Yashwant Telam and others against Tulshiram Telam in default for want of prosecution under Order 9 Rule 8 of the CPC, 1908. The dismissal was ordered because the plaintiffs failed to adduce evidence since August 2025, the plaintiff's advocate was absent despite specific directions, and the plaintiff failed to file the required affidavit of examination-in-chief, constituting an abuse of court process. Costs have been awarded against the plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts