Dipak Keshav Shide vs Sarkar Exice Department, Nashik — 41/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497, 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 11th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHNS230007212026
e-Filing Number
18-02-2026
Filing Number
718/2026
Filing Date
18-Feb-2026
Registration No
41/2026
Registration Date
20-Feb-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Igatpuri
Judge
1-2nd Jt.Civil Judge, Jd and JMFC
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Dipak Keshav Shide
Adv. Nivrutti Katore
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sarkar Exice Department, Nashik
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court allowed Dipak Shinde's application for interim possession of his seized Maruti Alto K10 LXI vehicle under Section 503 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, finding him to be the rightful owner based on documentary evidence. The vehicle was returned on conditions including a Rs. 3,00,000 indemnity bond, prohibition on sale until case conclusion, production of the vehicle as required, and preparation of detailed photographs for trial purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Jt.Civil Judge, Jd and JMFC
-
10-Mar-2026
Order
2nd Jt.Civil Judge, Jd and JMFC
-
07-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
2nd Jt.Civil Judge, Jd and JMFC
-
02-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
2nd Jt.Civil Judge, Jd and JMFC
-
25-Feb-2026
Reply/Say
2nd Jt.Civil Judge, Jd and JMFC
-
23-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 41/2026
The court allowed Dipak Shinde's application for interim possession of his seized Maruti Alto K10 LXI vehicle under Section 503 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, finding him to be the rightful owner based on documentary evidence. The vehicle was returned on conditions including a Rs. 3,00,000 indemnity bond, prohibition on sale until case conclusion, production of the vehicle as required, and preparation of detailed photographs for trial purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts