State Through Ghoti P Stn vs Narayan Bandu Joshi — 391/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHNS230006552024

Filing Number

655/2024

Filing Date

26-Apr-2024

Registration No

391/2024

Registration Date

26-Apr-2024

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Igatpuri

Judge

1-2nd Jt.Civil Judge, Jd and JMFC

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

258

Police Station

GHOTI POLICE STATION

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Through Ghoti P Stn

    Adv. Asst.Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Narayan Bandu Joshi

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court stopped proceedings against accused Narayan Bandu Joshi under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, because the prosecution failed to secure his presence despite issuing summons over an extended period. The accused was released from charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, and the rightful owner of seized mugs and glasses must follow due legal process for their custody after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge, Jd and JMFC

  4. 09-Sep-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge, Jd and JMFC

  5. 06-Jun-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt Cjsd and Add. CJM

  6. 01-Feb-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  7. 29-Aug-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  8. 30-Apr-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 26-Apr-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 391/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court stopped proceedings against accused Narayan Bandu Joshi under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, because the prosecution failed to secure his presence despite issuing summons over an extended period. The accused was released from charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, and the rightful owner of seized mugs and glasses must follow due legal process for their custody after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case