Alka Dashrath Jadhav and others vs Ganesh Dashrath Jadhav — 33/2020

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section cpc. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 05-May-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHNS230005182020

Filing Number

56/2020

Filing Date

26-Mar-2020

Registration No

33/2020

Registration Date

26-Mar-2020

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Igatpuri

Judge

4-Civil Judge, Senior Division

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section cpc

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Alka Dashrath Jadhav and others

    Adv. Shaikh Mohd. Akbar C.

  2. 2.Archna Namdev Ugale

  3. 3.Suvarna Bhagvat Barhe

  4. 4.Jayashree Sharad Matale

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ganesh Dashrath Jadhav

Case History

  1. 05-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge, Senior Division

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge, Senior Division

  4. 11-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge, Senior Division

  5. 14-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge, Senior Division

  6. 12-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge, Senior Division

  7. 18-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge, Senior Division

  8. 28-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge, Senior Division

  9. 04-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge, Senior Division

  10. 18-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge, Senior Division

  11. 03-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge, Senior Division

  12. 13-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge, Senior Division

  13. 05-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge, Senior Division

  14. 01-Jul-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge, Senior Division

  15. 12-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge, Senior Division

  16. 29-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge, Senior Division

  17. 15-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge, Senior Division

  18. 04-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge, Senior Division

  19. 05-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge, Senior Division

  20. 16-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge, Senior Division

  21. 21-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  22. 04-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  23. 16-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  24. 08-May-2024

    Evidence

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  25. 27-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  26. 13-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  27. 16-Jan-2024

    Depositing Amount

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  28. 05-Dec-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  29. 30-Oct-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  30. 13-Sep-2023

    Dismissal Order

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  31. 17-Jul-2023

    Dismissal Order

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  32. 13-Jun-2023

    Dismissal Order

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  33. 12-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  34. 20-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  35. 11-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  36. 21-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  37. 07-Nov-2022

    List of Witness

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  38. 21-Sep-2022

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  39. 17-Aug-2022

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  40. 11-Jul-2022

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  41. 05-Apr-2022

    Issues

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  42. 09-Feb-2022

    Issues

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  43. 20-Dec-2021

    Issues

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  44. 08-Nov-2021

    Issues

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  45. 09-Oct-2021

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    SUMMARY The application for temporary injunction is partly allowed. The court restrained the defendant from alienating, creating third-party interest, or mortgaging suit property Gat no.530 until final disposal of the suit, finding that plaintiffs established a prima facie case and would suffer irreparable loss if protection were not granted. However, no injunction was granted regarding house no.196, as the plaintiff is the sole recorded owner and the defendant poses no threat to it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  46. 09-Oct-2021

    Issues

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  47. 29-Sep-2021

    Order on Exh

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  48. 21-Sep-2021

    Order on Exh

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  49. 18-Sep-2021

    Order on Exh

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  50. 14-Sep-2021

    Order on Exh

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  51. 25-Aug-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  52. 16-Aug-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  53. 25-Jun-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  54. 15-Apr-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  55. 05-Apr-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  56. 25-Feb-2021

    Reply Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  57. 02-Feb-2021

    Awaiting Notice

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  58. 23-Nov-2020

    Notice_Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  59. 19-Sep-2020

    Notice_Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  60. 01-Jul-2020

    Notice_Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  61. 16-Apr-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  62. 26-Mar-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 33/2020

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY The application for temporary injunction is partly allowed. The court restrained the defendant from alienating, creating third-party interest, or mortgaging suit property Gat no.530 until final disposal of the suit, finding that plaintiffs established a prima facie case and would suffer irreparable loss if protection were not granted. However, no injunction was granted regarding house no.196, as the plaintiff is the sole recorded owner and the defendant poses no threat to it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case