Vishal Kantilal Jain thru GPA Shahikant Shivchand Parkh vs Namdev Baburao Khatale Advocate - Jadhav Rajaram A. — 27/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38,. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHNS230002082023
Next Hearing
04th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
36/2023
Filing Date
06-02-2023
Registration No
27/2023
Registration Date
06-02-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Igatpuri
Judge
4-Civil Judge, Senior Division
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vishal Kantilal Jain thru GPA Shahikant Shivchand Parkh
Adv. Khandelwal Satish R.
Respondent(s)
Namdev Baburao Khatale Advocate - Jadhav Rajaram A.
Popat Baburao Khatale
Sanjay Damodar Khatale
Machhindra Damodar Khatale
Vijay Damodar Khatale
Mangal Navnath Barhe
Nitin Ramu Khatale
Kalabai Damodar Khatale
Dipak Ramu Khatale
Pandhari Ramu Khatale
Sitabai Ramu Khatale
Sangitabai Ramu Khatale
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Civil Judge, Senior Division
Issues
Issues
Issues
Issues
Issues
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Issues | |
| 10-03-2026 | Issues | |
| 09-03-2026 | Issues | |
| 23-02-2026 | Issues | |
| 09-02-2026 | Issues |
Interim Orders
Summary The court granted an ad-interim injunction restraining the defendants from constructing on the plaintiff's property (survey no.34/1/4) pending their appearance. The court found prima facie that the plaintiff owns the suit property and the defendants are attempting unauthorized encroachment, and issued a show cause notice to the defendants regarding why a temporary injunction should not be made permanent. The plaintiff was directed to comply with Order 39 Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court granted an ad-interim injunction restraining the defendants from constructing on the plaintiff's property (survey no.34/1/4) pending their appearance. The court found prima facie that the plaintiff owns the suit property and the defendants are attempting unauthorized encroachment, and issued a show cause notice to the defendants regarding why a temporary injunction should not be made permanent. The plaintiff was directed to comply with Order 39 Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts