State Through Ghoti P Stn vs Gautam Madhukar Patekar — 70/2022
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(A). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS230001182022
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
104/2022
Filing Date
13-01-2022
Registration No
70/2022
Registration Date
13-01-2022
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Igatpuri
Judge
1-2nd Jt.Civil Judge, JD and JMFC
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
308
Police Station
GHOTI POLICE STATION
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Through Ghoti P Stn
Adv. Rike Jaydev S
Respondent(s)
Gautam Madhukar Patekar
Govind Arjun Dabhade
Hearing History
Judge: 1-2nd Jt.Civil Judge, JD and JMFC
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 08-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 17-09-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 17-04-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 18-11-2024 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court halted proceedings under Section 258 of the Cr.P.C., 1973 against accused Gautam Madhukar Patekar and Govind Arjun Dabhade in a gambling offense case, as the prosecution failed to secure their presence despite issuance of summons over a prolonged period. Both accused were released from charges under Section 12A of the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, with seized cash to be credited to the state and remaining seized items destroyed after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court halted proceedings under Section 258 of the Cr.P.C., 1973 against accused Gautam Madhukar Patekar and Govind Arjun Dabhade in a gambling offense case, as the prosecution failed to secure their presence despite issuance of summons over a prolonged period. Both accused were released from charges under Section 12A of the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, with seized cash to be credited to the state and remaining seized items destroyed after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts