State of Maharashtra vs Vijay Pandurang Sonawane — 846/2021
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS210010872021
Filing Number
1055/2021
Filing Date
23-Aug-2021
Registration No
846/2021
Registration Date
23-Aug-2021
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Manmad
Judge
2-Extra Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
16
Police Station
MANMAD CITY POLICE STATION
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. App Pawar Girish G.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Vijay Pandurang Sonawane
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Manmad City Court discharged accused Vijay Pandurang Sonawane under Section 258 of Cr.P.C. in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E) case, finding that the prosecution repeatedly failed to appear and examine witnesses despite ample opportunities. The court concluded that continuing the trial would waste both state resources and judicial time, making discharge appropriate under its special case disposal drive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Extra Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC
-
05-Jan-2026
Evidence
Extra Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC
-
04-Nov-2025
Evidence
Extra Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC
-
06-Oct-2025
Evidence
Extra Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC
-
03-Sep-2025
Evidence
Extra Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC
-
14-Aug-2025
Evidence
Extra Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC
-
11-Jul-2025
Evidence
Extra Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC
-
21-Jun-2025
Evidence
Extra Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC
-
07-May-2025
Hearing
Extra Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC
-
16-Apr-2025
Hearing
Extra Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC
-
13-Mar-2025
Hearing
Extra Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC
-
07-Feb-2025
Plea / Particulars
Extra Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC
-
01-Jan-2025
Plea / Particulars
Extra Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC
-
25-Nov-2024
Plea / Particulars
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.manmad City
-
08-Oct-2024
Plea / Particulars
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.manmad City
-
23-Sep-2024
Plea / Particulars
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.manmad City
-
28-Aug-2024
Plea / Particulars
Joint Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate,First Class
-
18-Jul-2024
Plea / Particulars
Joint Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate,First Class
-
18-Jun-2024
Plea / Particulars
Joint Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate,First Class
-
03-May-2024
Plea / Particulars
Joint Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate,First Class
-
01-Apr-2024
Awaiting Summons
Joint Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate,First Class
-
13-Mar-2024
Awaiting Summons
Joint Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate,First Class
-
17-Feb-2024
Awaiting Summons
Joint Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate,First Class
-
16-Jan-2024
Awaiting Summons
Joint Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate,First Class
-
15-Jan-2024
Awaiting Summons
Joint Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate,First Class
-
31-Oct-2023
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.manmad City
-
19-Aug-2023
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.manmad City
-
16-Jun-2023
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.manmad City
-
13-Apr-2023
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.manmad City
-
11-Jan-2023
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.manmad City
-
06-Oct-2022
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.manmad City
-
18-Jul-2022
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.manmad City
-
08-Apr-2022
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.manmad City
-
18-Dec-2021
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.manmad City
-
23-Aug-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Aug-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 846/2021
The Manmad City Court discharged accused Vijay Pandurang Sonawane under Section 258 of Cr.P.C. in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E) case, finding that the prosecution repeatedly failed to appear and examine witnesses despite ample opportunities. The court concluded that continuing the trial would waste both state resources and judicial time, making discharge appropriate under its special case disposal drive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts