State of Maharashtra vs Sachin Madhukar Kamble — 336/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65 E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHNS210006712025

Filing Number

559/2025

Filing Date

19-Jul-2025

Registration No

336/2025

Registration Date

19-Jul-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Manmad

Judge

1-CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.manmad City

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

45

Police Station

MANMAD CITY POLICE STATION

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65 E

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP Patil Avinash S.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sachin Madhukar Kamble

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The court discharged accused Sachin Madhukar Kamble from charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 258 CrPC. The discharge was granted because no chemical analyzer report was filed despite the case pending since July 2025, making it impossible to establish the offense. The court also cancelled the accused's bail bonds and directed seizure disposal to the State Excise Department. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.manmad City

  4. 20-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.manmad City

  5. 16-Oct-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.manmad City

  6. 19-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 19-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 336/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court discharged accused Sachin Madhukar Kamble from charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 258 CrPC. The discharge was granted because no chemical analyzer report was filed despite the case pending since July 2025, making it impossible to establish the offense. The court also cancelled the accused's bail bonds and directed seizure disposal to the State Excise Department. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case