Chandrashekhar Govindrao More vs Kishor Govindrao More Advocate - Sonawane Kishor E — 14/2016
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 37,38,39. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHNS210003422016
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
28/2016
Filing Date
21-04-2016
Registration No
14/2016
Registration Date
21-04-2016
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Manmad
Judge
2-EXTRA JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chandrashekhar Govindrao More
Adv. Kunzarkar Anil G
Respondent(s)
Kishor Govindrao More Advocate - Sonawane Kishor E
Sou. Seema Kishor More
Adv. Sonawane Kishor E
Sou. Dipa Dadasaheb Balid
Adv. Sonawane Kishor E
Hearing History
Judge: 2-EXTRA JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. JMFC
Arguments
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 10-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 13-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 12-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 08-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: Niyamit Dikvani Dava Case No. 14/2016 (Manmad District Court) Outcome: The plaintiff's petition for relief regarding ownership rights to a residential property (Plot No. 12, Village Nandgaon) has been dismissed. The court held that Defendants 1 and 2 are the lawful owners of the property based on a valid death certificate (dated 23.03.2011) that established their succession rights, and the plaintiff has no legal claim to the property. The plaintiff's request for interim relief (petition No. 5) seeking to remain in the property was also rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: Niyamit Dikvani Dava Case No. 14/2016 (Manmad District Court) Outcome: The plaintiff's petition for relief regarding ownership rights to a residential property (Plot No. 12, Village Nandgaon) has been dismissed. The court held that Defendants 1 and 2 are the lawful owners of the property based on a valid death certificate (dated 23.03.2011) that established their succession rights, and the plaintiff has no legal claim to the property. The plaintiff's request for interim relief (petition No. 5) seeking to remain in the property was also rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts