State of Maharashtra vs Sundarlal Sitaram Jadhav Advocate - Pathan Munawwar M. — 39/2023
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS210000782023
e-Filing Number
22-12-2022
Filing Number
74/2023
Filing Date
30-01-2023
Registration No
39/2023
Registration Date
30-01-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Manmad
Judge
2-EXTRA JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. JMFC
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
367
Police Station
MANMAD CITY POLICE STATION
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Respondent(s)
Sundarlal Sitaram Jadhav Advocate - Pathan Munawwar M.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-EXTRA JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. JMFC
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 11-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 03-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 06-11-2025 | Evidence | |
| 08-10-2025 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The City Court, Manmad acquitted accused Sundarlal Kantilal Jadhav under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E) case. The court found that the prosecution failed to appear or examine witnesses despite multiple opportunities since the final report was filed on 30.01.2023, constituting wastage of judicial time and state resources. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and seized property was ordered to be disposed of per Section 452 of Cr.P.C. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The City Court, Manmad acquitted accused Sundarlal Kantilal Jadhav under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E) case. The court found that the prosecution failed to appear or examine witnesses despite multiple opportunities since the final report was filed on 30.01.2023, constituting wastage of judicial time and state resources. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and seized property was ordered to be disposed of per Section 452 of Cr.P.C. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts