State of Maharashtra.. Thr P I Sinnar P Stn vs Ramaram Ganeshram Chaudhari — 440/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498(A),504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHNS200021702024

Filing Number

2170/2024

Filing Date

13-Nov-2024

Registration No

440/2024

Registration Date

13-Nov-2024

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Sinnar

Judge

3-Jt. C.J.J.D. And JMFC

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

312

Police Station

SINNAR POLICE STATION

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 498(A),504,506,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra.. Thr P I Sinnar P Stn

    Adv. APP Jadhav Reena B.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ramaram Ganeshram Chaudhari

  2. 2.Sujaram Chaudhari

  3. 3.Naresh Kumar Gamnaram Chaudhari

  4. 4.Dinesh Chaudhari

  5. 5.Kamlesh Chaudhari

  6. 6.Saroj Chaudhari

  7. 7.Manjudevi Kuldip Patel

  8. 8.Kuldip Patel

  9. 9.Kanaram Chaudhari

  10. 10.Andharam Chaudari

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: 440/2024 Court Decision: The Sinnar First Class Magistrate Court acquitted all 10 accused persons of charges under Indian Penal Code Sections 498(A), 504, 506 read with Section 34, acquitting them on May 13, 2026. Key Reasoning: The two prosecution witnesses (the complainant Minakshi Chaudhari and her sister Sunita Banadit) provided conflicting and unreliable testimony in court compared to their police statements. Both witnesses admitted to out-of-court settlements with the accused and reconciliation, raising doubts about the credibility of their accusations of dowry harassment and intimidation. The court found insufficient corroborating evidence to establish the alleged crimes beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-May-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. C.J.J.D. And JMFC

  4. 06-May-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Jt. C.J.J.D. And JMFC

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. C.J.J.D. And JMFC

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Jt. C.J.J.D. And JMFC

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    Filing of Surety

    Jt. C.J.J.D. And JMFC

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    Filing of Surety

    Jt. C.J.J.D. And JMFC

  9. 17-Jan-2026

    Filing of Surety

    Jt. C.J.J.D. And JMFC

  10. 18-Dec-2025

    Filing of Surety

    Jt. C.J.J.D. And JMFC

  11. 16-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. C.J.J.D. And JMFC

  12. 16-Jul-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. C.J.J.D. And JMFC

  13. 16-Apr-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. C.J.J.D. And JMFC

  14. 16-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  15. 13-Nov-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 440/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 440/2024 Court Decision: The Sinnar First Class Magistrate Court acquitted all 10 accused persons of charges under Indian Penal Code Sections 498(A), 504, 506 read with Section 34, acquitting them on May 13, 2026. Key Reasoning: The two prosecution witnesses (the complainant Minakshi Chaudhari and her sister Sunita Banadit) provided conflicting and unreliable testimony in court compared to their police statements. Both witnesses admitted to out-of-court settlements with the accused and reconciliation, raising doubts about the credibility of their accusations of dowry harassment and intimidation. The court found insufficient corroborating evidence to establish the alleged crimes beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case