State of Maharashtra...Thr P I MIDC P Stn Sinnar vs Bhaskar Kondaji Dhokrat — 924/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHNS200014772024

Filing Number

1477/2024

Filing Date

06-Aug-2024

Registration No

924/2024

Registration Date

06-Aug-2024

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Sinnar

Judge

2-2Nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

324

Police Station

MIDC SINNAR POLICE STATION

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra...Thr P I MIDC P Stn Sinnar

    Adv. APP JORWAR SUNIL L.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bhaskar Kondaji Dhokrat

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The court stopped proceedings and discharged accused Bhaskar Kondaji Dhokrat under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for an offense under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, because the prosecution failed to file the Chemical Analyzer's report, making trial futile. The seized liquor was confiscated to the State Excise Department, and case files were retained for potential reopening if required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2Nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

  4. 18-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    2Nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

  5. 18-Jul-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    2Nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

  6. 18-Jan-2025

    Unready Board

    2Nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

  7. 08-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 06-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 924/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court stopped proceedings and discharged accused Bhaskar Kondaji Dhokrat under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for an offense under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, because the prosecution failed to file the Chemical Analyzer's report, making trial futile. The seized liquor was confiscated to the State Excise Department, and case files were retained for potential reopening if required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case