State of Maharashtra...Thr P I MIDC P Stn Sinnar vs Bhausaheb Kedu Yetal — 921/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS200014742024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1474/2024
Filing Date
06-08-2024
Registration No
921/2024
Registration Date
06-08-2024
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Sinnar
Judge
2-2ND Jt. CJJD AND JMFC
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
325
Police Station
MIDC SINNAR POLICE STATION
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra...Thr P I MIDC P Stn Sinnar
Adv. APP JORWAR SUNIL L.
Respondent(s)
Bhausaheb Kedu Yetal
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2ND Jt. CJJD AND JMFC
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Unready Board
Unready Board
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 18-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 18-07-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 18-01-2025 | Unready Board | |
| 08-08-2024 | Unready Board |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court discharged accused Bhausaheb Kedu Yetal of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 (Section 65(e)) by invoking Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, finding it futile to proceed without the Chemical Analyzer's report filed by the prosecution. The confiscated liquor was ordered transferred to the State Excise Department for disposal, with case records retained for potential reopening under Section 337(5) if new evidence emerges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court discharged accused Bhausaheb Kedu Yetal of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 (Section 65(e)) by invoking Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, finding it futile to proceed without the Chemical Analyzer's report filed by the prosecution. The confiscated liquor was ordered transferred to the State Excise Department for disposal, with case records retained for potential reopening under Section 337(5) if new evidence emerges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts