State Excise C Division Nashik vs Bhushan Chintaman Adhav — 797/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHNS200012852024

Filing Number

1285/2024

Filing Date

04-Jul-2024

Registration No

797/2024

Registration Date

04-Jul-2024

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Sinnar

Judge

2-2Nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Excise C Division Nashik

    Adv. APP JORWAR SUNIL L.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bhushan Chintaman Adhav

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The JMFC Sinnar discharged accused Bhushan Chintaman Aadhav under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for an alleged offense under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, due to the prosecution's failure to file the Chemical Analyzer's report—finding that continuing the trial would be futile. The confiscated liquor was ordered transferred to the State Excise Department, with case records retained for potential reopening if new evidence surfaces. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2Nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

  4. 18-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    2Nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

  5. 18-Jul-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    2Nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

  6. 18-Jan-2025

    Unready Board

    2Nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

  7. 18-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 04-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 797/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The JMFC Sinnar discharged accused Bhushan Chintaman Aadhav under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for an alleged offense under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, due to the prosecution's failure to file the Chemical Analyzer's report—finding that continuing the trial would be futile. The confiscated liquor was ordered transferred to the State Excise Department, with case records retained for potential reopening if new evidence surfaces. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case