State Excise C Division Nashik vs Santosh Baban More — 460/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHNS200007362024

Filing Number

736/2024

Filing Date

08-Apr-2024

Registration No

460/2024

Registration Date

08-Apr-2024

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Sinnar

Judge

2-2Nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Excise C Division Nashik

    Adv. APP JORWAR SUNIL L.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Santosh Baban More

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sinnar, discharged accused Santosh Baban More under Section 258 of the CrPC, 1973, finding the prosecution's case unmaintainable due to the absence of the Chemical Analyzer's report despite multiple summons. The court ordered confiscation of the liquor to the State Excise Department and directed preservation of case records for potential reopening under Section 300(5) of the CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2Nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

  4. 10-Oct-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    2Nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

  5. 28-Apr-2025

    Unready Board

    2Nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

  6. 18-Oct-2024

    Unready Board

    2Nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

  7. 18-Apr-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 08-Apr-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 460/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sinnar, discharged accused Santosh Baban More under Section 258 of the CrPC, 1973, finding the prosecution's case unmaintainable due to the absence of the Chemical Analyzer's report despite multiple summons. The court ordered confiscation of the liquor to the State Excise Department and directed preservation of case records for potential reopening under Section 300(5) of the CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case