State Excise C Division Nashik vs Dasharath Mohan Lahane — 458/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHNS200007342024

Filing Number

734/2024

Filing Date

08-Apr-2024

Registration No

458/2024

Registration Date

08-Apr-2024

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Sinnar

Judge

2-2Nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Excise C Division Nashik

    Adv. APP JORWAR SUNIL L.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dasharath Mohan Lahane

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court discharged accused Pavan Dashrath Mohan Lahane under Section 258 of the CrPC, stopping proceedings for an offense under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, due to the prosecution's failure to file the Chemical Analyzer's report despite multiple summons. The confiscated liquor was ordered transferred to the State Excise Department, with case records retained for potential reopening under Section 300(5) of the CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2Nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

  4. 10-Oct-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    2Nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

  5. 28-Apr-2025

    Unready Board

    2Nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

  6. 18-Oct-2024

    Unready Board

    2Nd Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

  7. 18-Apr-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 08-Apr-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 458/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged accused Pavan Dashrath Mohan Lahane under Section 258 of the CrPC, stopping proceedings for an offense under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, due to the prosecution's failure to file the Chemical Analyzer's report despite multiple summons. The confiscated liquor was ordered transferred to the State Excise Department, with case records retained for potential reopening under Section 300(5) of the CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case