State of Maharashtra...Thr P I MIDC P Stn Sinnar vs Dnyaneshwar Tukaram Dhokrat — 438/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS200006932024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
693/2024
Filing Date
10-04-2024
Registration No
438/2024
Registration Date
10-04-2024
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Sinnar
Judge
2-2ND Jt. CJJD AND JMFC
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
40
Police Station
MIDC SINNAR POLICE STATION
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra...Thr P I MIDC P Stn Sinnar
Adv. APP JORWAR SUNIL L.
Respondent(s)
Dnyaneshwar Tukaram Dhokrat
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2ND Jt. CJJD AND JMFC
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Unready Board
Unready Board
Unready Board
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-10-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 28-04-2025 | Unready Board | |
| 09-01-2025 | Unready Board | |
| 11-10-2024 | Unready Board |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court discharged accused Dyaneshwar Tukaram Dhokrat from charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, by invoking Section 258 of the CrPC, finding that proceeding with trial would be futile as the prosecution failed to file the Chemical Analyzer's report despite multiple summons. The liquor seized was ordered confiscated to the State Excise Department, with case records retained for potential reopening under Section 300(5) of the CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court discharged accused Dyaneshwar Tukaram Dhokrat from charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, by invoking Section 258 of the CrPC, finding that proceeding with trial would be futile as the prosecution failed to file the Chemical Analyzer's report despite multiple summons. The liquor seized was ordered confiscated to the State Excise Department, with case records retained for potential reopening under Section 300(5) of the CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts